Emergency Petition IMMEDIATE Action Required: Significant Covid-19 Testing Flaws, Vaccine Safety

Updated: Mar 22

Guest Petition compiled by Health Professionals


Health Professional Emergency Petition IMMEDIATE Action Required: Significant Covid-19 Testing Flaws & Vaccine Safety Issues:


Petition Signature Form HERE...Blog with Petition Sections at bottom of page HERE:


SCROLL TO BOTTOM OF PAGE TO DOWNLOAD AND HAND COLLECT SIGNATURES


Petition Summary Review


To:

All Public Health Officials, Political Representatives, State Health Departments & Health Licensure Boards, Hospital Administrators, Health Professional Licensing Boards, Covid-19 Testing Labs, College Health Program Administrators, Hospital Administrators & All Relevant Health Professional Organizations, School Health Directors and Journals:


There is significant evidence of severe issues with Covid-19 testing methods, directives, and protocols and serious safety concerns with Covid-19 vaccinations which are being actively ignored by health professional leadership, political representatives, and professional governing bodies.


Health professionals who attempt, in good faith, to engage leadership with these documented and evidence based concerns are being ignored, dismissed, or censored.


Evidence clearly indicates that implementation of current Covid-19 testing & Covid-19 vaccines and protocols is unnecessary and not serving the interests of individual and public health with significant documentation of harm resulting from these protocols.


Therefore:

We, the undersigned, request an IMMEDIATE suspension of public health directives pertaining to Sars Cov2, the virus attributed to cause Covid 19 infections, and a full independent review and investigation into pandemic policies created on the highly unreliable emergency approved PCR, Antibody, & Antigen testing which is not reliable or accurate to detect the virus it is employed to diagnosis and rationalized on research studies & trial designs that do not meet the minimum standards of scientific integrity to inform public disease, etc). health policy directives (peer review, control group, adequate population size, reliable testing measures for end outcome measurement and diagnosis of


Peer Review by 22 international experts of the scientific paper on which the PCR Testing for Sars CoV2) is based found ten severe flaws with the methods and concluded:


" 'In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless'.


"The design errors described here are so severe that it is highly unlikely that specific amplification of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material will occur using the protocol of the Corman-Drosten paper".


PCR testing is the central test employed for diagnosis of Covid 19 infection in the U.S..

The World Health Organization, FDA, and CDC have released statements and documents that affirm the Corman Drosten Review conclusions, as documented in detail in petition body below.


We further submit evidence demonstrating PCR tests have been set at high cycle threshold levels by government policy makers (CDC, FDA WHO) which will create mass false positives results for Covid-19 infections by default, and health officials, fully aware of the problem, failed to correct for the issue even after the issue was exposed on August 29, 2020 in the New York Times.


Additionally, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden, admitted in an interview on July 16, 2020 that high cycle threshold settings would create false positive results by default& stated anything over a 35 setting would be 'dead nucleotides' period, a dead and non-infectious material (see full petition below) demonstrating a full awareness of the severity and implications of this issue.


Officials are using methods and evidence known to be highly unreliable and inaccurate to justify sweeping public health mandates, civil rights restrictions, and interventions on severely compromised data.


New York Times Article Published August 29, Updated on January 19, 2021, this text is archived to be included in the original NYT article release:


"In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus" (full documentation in petition body)"


Additionally, the CDC has stated in the past, asymptomatic individuals should not be diagnosed with PCR testing or advised against utilizing the test for asymptomatic contacts of infected individuals due to serious potential for false positive results, as documented on November 11, 2011 in this CDC Best Use Guide For Pertussis Diagnosis with PCR testing:

(further documented below)


"Testing Patients with Signs and Symptoms of Pertussis: Early signs and symptoms of pertussis are often non-specific, making it difficult to determine clinically who has pertussis in the earliest stages


(http://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/clinical/features.html). However, only patients with signs and symptoms consistent with pertussis should be tested by PCR to confirm the diagnosis. Testing asymptomatic persons should be avoided as it increases the likelihood of obtaining falsely-positive results. Asymptomatic close contacts of confirmed cases should not be tested and testing of contacts should not be used for post-exposure prophylaxis decisions".

Nothing has inherently changed about PCR method or protocol to explain this inexplicable change in guidance by the CDC for recommendation for PCR test application, interpretation, and use.


Further, there is extensive documented evidence of mass contamination with early PCR tests. The CDC admitted it knowingly released flawed testing for mass public use.


Millions of tests were recalled in the US & globally due to safety and contamination issues due to bacterial and viral contamination. There has been no accounting to the public by government health officials for the use of contaminated and unreliable tests last spring.

We assert these issues have created serious and potential individual and public health harm, and create legal liability issues for health professionals charged with implementing protocols that go against the evidence based standards required for safe, legal, and ethical practice.


Further, there is significant and credible evidence that a mass vaccination program with emergency approved vaccinations is unnecessary and will contribute to individual and public health harm.


Much of this evidence has been available for public review for months, some since before the Covid 19 pandemic policies were implemented. It is incumbent upon professional and public leadership to actively educate themselves, especially since Covid-19 testing and vaccinations are approved for emergency use only, and have not been vetted with the normal safety procedures.


Evidence has been organized into the following seven categories:


Section 1.


Serious Sars CoV2 (Covid 19) Testing Method &

Protocol Errors: PCR, Antibody, & Antigen

Covid-19 Health Policy Based on Severely Flawed Science and Data


SECTION 2:

No Asymptomatic Transmission:

Asymptomatic Presentation of Positive Covid-19 Test Result Due to Faulty Tests, Testing Methods & Protocols

SECTION 3:

Serious Contamination Testing Issues with Early Covid-19 Testing Kits

Mass Contamination & Recall of Millions Early PCR Tests & Other Covid-19 Test Kits Resulted in Mass Faulty Data & Public Health Safety Concerns:


SECTION 4

Liability Concerns for Health Professionals:

Mass Public Evidence of Severe Issues with Covid-19 Health Directives Used in Litigation, Imperils Health Care Professionals Ordered to Implement Unsound Health Protocols:


SECTION 5

Censorship & Political, Professional, Media Misinformation & Attack

Advancing Individual & Public Health Harms, Denigrating Health Professionals and Citizens


SECTION 6

Sars CoV2 Covid-19 Emergency Approved Vaccines

Unnecessary & Unsafe: Post-Vaccine Injury and Deaths Go Uninvestigated and Unreported

SECTION 7:

Mass Individual & Public Health Harms

Result of Covid-19 Directives Based on Severely Flawed Science and Data


THE EVIDENCE:

SECTION 1:

Sars CoV2 (Covid 19) Testing Method & Protocol Errors:

Covid-19 Health Policy Based on Severely Flawed Science and Data

Severe Errors, Flaws with Tests, Incorrect Testing Recommendations Documented with Covid-19 PCR, Antigen, and Antibody Test Methods Render Tests Unreliable, Inaccurate, and Unsuitable for Diagnosis of Covid-19 infections:


RT PCR Testing for Sars CoV2 - Virus Attributed to Covid-19 infection:


RT PCR testing for the detection of Sars CoV2 (virus attributed to Covid 19 symptoms) was approved on an emergency use basis on January 22, 2020, one day after submission of paper out-lining the science for Emergency Approval without appropriate peer review PCR testing was approved, peer reviewe occurred on November 22, 2020.


Peer review was curate by the International Consortium of Scientists Life Science division with top twenty two expert researchers in relevant fields including Dr Michael Yeadon, former Vice President of Pfizer, and found ten serious flaws with testing forcing the review committee to conclude:

'In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless'.


The review committee has submitted a request for a full retraction of the scientific paper on which the RT PCR tests are based.

https://cormandrostenreview.com/retraction-request-letter-to-eurosurveillance-editorial-board/


Cease and desist orders have been filed against the paper's author, Corman Drosten due to the severe individual and public health harm that has resulted due to the inaccuracies in his paper providing severely flawed protocols for diagnosis of Sars Cov2 Covid 19 infections.:


Atty Reiner Fuellmich Cease & Desist to Corman Drosten Document:


https://drive.google.com/file/d/17X4GmMXn_m-vDwqEy9vMhbNqzodAEW3b/view

RT PCR tests work by detecting the presence of a shortened strand of RNA attributed to the Sars CoV2 virus through amplification of testing sample material. Every cycle that the test material is run through decreases the amount of available material, so when run through too many cycles, the material detected is nothing more than non-infectious dead matter.


Since Fauci's admission on 7/16/2020 , the public has been informed that the RT PCR tests were recommended by public health organizations (FDA, WHO, CDC) to be run at cycle threshold levels (40 cycles with some US labs running test up to 45 CT) which will produce mass false positive results by default.


According to the CDC, false positives have the potential to create significant harms:


"In the event of a false positive result, risks to patients could include the following: a recommendation for isolation of the patient, monitoring of household or other close

contacts for symptoms, patient isolation that might limit contact with family or friends and may increase contact with other potentially COVID-19 patients, limits in the ability to work, delayed diagnosis and treatment for the true infection causing the symptoms, unnecessary prescription of a treatment or therapy, or other unintended adverse effects.".


CDC FACT SHEET FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS:

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/Factsheet-for-Healthcare-Providers-2019-nCoV.pdf

Additional public health harms not stated by the CDC include unnecessary implementation of public health protocol that are documented to be creating mass psychological and physical health harms. (See section below on public health harms)

The New York Times highlighted this issue last August when it revealed that studies adjusting for Cycle Threshold rates in RT PCR test samples taken from three US states returned false positive rates between 85 to 90%.on this ONE error alone.


"In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus":

90% testing error rate on a single testing recommendation error thus create significant individual health harms as stated by the CDC


Despite these shocking statistics, the official public health organizations responsible for directing Covid 19 response did NOT change recommendations to lower CT rates and every state except Florida, the CT rate was NOT recommended for inclusion in reports report at all until December 14, 2020.

Not all labs are yet following this recommendation:

Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be. - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html


Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/09/coronavirus-cases-plummet-when-pcr-tests-are-adjusted/


Government & public health officials are fully aware of the issue:

Dr Anthony Fauci who was a lead member of President Donald Trump's Corona virus task force, & currently acts as Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden stated in a video on July 16, 2020 that PCR Cycle Threshold rates above 35 are just 'dead nucleotides, period', i.e. a dead and non infectious material.


He also untruthfully answered interviewer when questioned if Cycle Threshold rate were included in lab reports stating 'yes'.


July 16 2020 episode of “This Week in Virology” science podcast hosted by Columbia University virologist Vincent Racaniello:


Quote from Fauci from above interview:


Interviewer: Is the threshold cycle, uh, is reporting that a pretty standard practice in doing a diagnosis now rather than just a positive or negative?

Dr Anthony Fauci; (nods head yes) Yeah.

Fauci goes on to admit in this interview individuals receiving PCR test report will not receive cycle threshold number with positive test result

Interviewer then asks: But, they've got it (referring to care provider responsible for diagnosis):

Dr. Anthony Fauci: They've got it...they've got it


Interview has been archived & may be viewed here:

https://principia-scientific.com/dr-fauci-admits-covid-test-picks-up-harmless-dead-virus/


However, the New York Times reported on 8/29/20:

" number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are....


It was not until the World Health Organization partially addressed the RT PCR testing errors and issued a statement on 12/14/2020 adjusting criteria for positive diagnosis through PCR testing that Cycle Threshold rate should be included with lab reports although they failed to lower Cycle Threshold hold rate recommendations to levels which would prevent the problem entirely:


As the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 decreases, the positive predictive value also decreases. This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as positivity rate decreases, irrespective of the assay specificity. Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts, etc"


The WHO statement of symptom inclusion as part of diagnostic criteria is stunning, as this criteria should be basic practice for any diagnostic review.


Diagnostic tests are screening tools and should NEVER substitute for thorough review of all presenting clinical symptoms and lab test data. Citing asymptomatic infection on the sole basis of results from a Sars CoV2 PCR, antigen, or antibody test does NOT meet the minimum medical standards for competent diagnosis of disease or illness. This statement constitutes an open admission by the WHO that asymptomatic PCR tests are not adequate proof infection with Sars CoV2 and invalidates the argument for 'asymptomatic transmission'.


Additionally, since the high cycle threshold rate is only one of the ten flaws cited by International Consortium of Science curated peer review of PCR testing, ALL positive test should not be considered reliable for diagnosis of Covid 19 infections deemed 'useless' for this purpose.


WHO deleted original statement which has been archived by multiple sources and issued new statement on 1/14/21 omitting recommendation to include symptom criteria as part of diagnosis:

https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05


It was predicted that case rates and hospitalizations attributed to Sars CoV2 infection would drop with the new WHO recommendations and, this indeed has occurred since the official recommendation came out in December


https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/09/coronavirus-cases-plummet-when-pcr-tests-are-adjusted/

https://sofrep.com/news/did-a-quietly-made-change-in-testing-cause-covid-infections-to-drop-45/

Public health officials and media outlets are now stating that 'herd immunity' and 'vaccines' are responsible for this drop in cases that was forecast to occur due to simple change in testing protocol recommendations, failing to inform the public of a very critical information to understanding pandemic numbers.

Severe Flaws Antigen & Antibody Testing:

RT PCR testing is not the only severely flawed testing method that is being utilized for the detection of the Sars CoV2 virus.


The Rapid Antigen Testing has a very high false positive error return when used in populations with low infection prevalence according to the FDA:

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/letters-health-care-providers/potential-false-positive-results-antigen-tests-rapid-detection-sars-cov-2-letter-clinical-laboratory


"Remember that positive predictive value (PPV) varies with disease prevalence when interpreting results from diagnostic tests. PPV is the percent of positive test results that are true positives. As disease prevalence decreases, the percent of test results that are false positives increase.


For Example:

"At 0.1% prevalence, the PPV would only be 4%, meaning that 96 out of 100 positive results would be false positives.'


The majority of communities who ordered and implemented the use of Rapid Antigen testing had very low infection prevalence at the time of implementation of mass Antigen testing for Sars CoV2.


According to the FDA, the subsequent positive results would return mostly false positives. There is no reliability in determining true positive rates through antigen testing due to use in low infection populations yet these positives are included in official numbers without caveat. Rapid Antigen continues to be implement and recommended in areas of low incidence (population) and this practice

will result in MAJORITY of false positive:


In Massachusetts, for example, there is currently a rate of .3.1% active cases, as of March 11, 2021 according to Mass.gov update center. Due to other testing issues this number is likely completely inaccurate, however, if we go by the official data:


According to the FDA, use of this test in this population would result in approximately 90 out of a 100 false positives with Massachusetts population of 6.9 million people. Individual counties are at much lower rates of Sars CoV2 attributed cases with some at .08%, in these areas testing would produce nar 100% false positives.

Other states are currently at approximately same rates or lower.


Right now, implementation of rapid antigen testing is being expanded around the United States and world despite FDA warning that near majority false positives will be generated by implementing testing in this way.


This is completely unacceptable application of a test method that goes against the government's own FDA warning. Use in low incident populations will create majority false positive results, and there needs to be accountability by public health officials why the test is being employed in this scenario at all.

Lastly, Sars CoV2 Antibody tests are also unsuitable for reliable diagnosis of Sars CoV2:


"A positive result for the SARS-CoV-2 antibody is indicative of an acute or recent infection. A positive result may also be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus hKU1, NL63, OC43 or 229E that cause a mild illness like the common cold"


CDC Health Team Updates

https://www.utmb.edu/covid-19/updates/article/healthcare-team-updates/2020/04/30/sars-cov-2-(covid-19)-antibody-test


Further, in both the case of positive Sars CoV2 Covid 19 antigen and antibody testing, it is recommended that individuals with positive tests receive a unreliable RT PCR test for confirmation.


In addition to individual public health harmed caused by utilization of tests unsuitable for diagnosis of Sars CoV2, it has created a potential liability situation for the health professionals, nurses and doctors charged with instituting mass testing programs with fundamentally flawed, unreliable methods. It is against ethical, professional, and legal standards for health professionals to implement protocols documented to be severely flawed and have potential to create individual and public health harms.


SECTION 2:

No Asymptomatic Transmission:

Asymptomatic Presentation of Positive Covid-19 Test Result Due to Faulty Tests, Testing Methods & Protocols

Current Sars CoV2 public health protection protocols (social distancing, lock-downs, masking, etc) are rationalized on the scientifically unsupported theory of asymptomatic transmission. This hypothesis arose from majority of individuals testing positives for Sars CoV2 (Covid 19 infection) with PCR testing do not present symptomatically.

However, as documented above, asymptomatic presentation would be the expected result with PCR test over amplifying sample material through high CT rates resulting in up to 90% false positives per studies reported in NYT; as individual are not ill or contagious.

UP to 86% of Individuals with Positive PCR test have No Core Symptoms of Covid 19 Infection

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/08/more-than-80percent-of-people-with-coronavirus-had-no-symptoms-uk-study.html

Additionally, advocates of the asymptomatic spread theory utilize research that is not designed to study for method of transmission of Sars CoV2 but rather evaluates viral load detected on RT PCR tests to hypothesize asymptomatic transmission as a main driver of virus spread. As in this CNN example using a study published in JAMA Medicine:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/07/health/covid-asymptomatic-transmission-study-wellness/index.html

The study authors admit that their research is not designed to determine method of transmission of virus and states:

"Although the high viral load we observed in asymptomatic patients raises a distinct possibility of a risk for transmission, our study was not designed to determine this," the researchers wrote.

"It is important to note that detection of viral RNA does not equate infectious virus being present and transmissible," the researchers wrote. "

This is a STUNNING statement, as it admits that a positive test result is not reliable proof that the infection originated from Sars CoV2 or the person is infected AT ALL.

This was further documented in the Corman Drosten report above:

The design errors described here are so severe that it is highly unlikely that specific amplification of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material will occur using the protocol of the Corman-Drosten paper

According to this statement from 22 top scientific experts in relevant research fields:

the WHO/FDA/CDC and all government health organizations have been recommending & implementing the use of a test that is highly unlikely to detect Sars Cov2 virus due to severe problems with testing design. Almost the entire basis of the Sars CoV2 Covid-19 pandemic has been rationalized on the results of these tests. This renders all data results from PCR testing severely corrupted.

CDC Admitted in 2011 PCR Inappropriate for Screening Asymptomatic Individuals for Infection:

CDC warned in 2011 that PCR testing should not be used in diagnosis of petussis infections due to significant potential for false positive results.


Nothing inherently has changed about PCR testing method and process to explain for the CDC's change from it former recommendations:

Testing Patients with Signs and Symptoms of Pertussis Early signs and symptoms of pertussis are often non-specific, making it difficult to determine clinically who has pertussis in the earliest stages (http://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/clinical/features.html).


However, only patients with signs and symptoms consistent with pertussis should be tested by PCR to confirm the diagnosis. Testing asymptomatic persons should be avoided as it increases the likelihood of obtaining falsely-positive results. Asymptomatic close contacts of confirmed cases should not be tested and testing of contacts should not be used for post-exposure prophylaxis decisions. https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/clinical/downloads/diagnosis-pcr-bestpractices.pdf

There needs to immediate review by labs to correct for Cycle Threshold rate error on past lab reports and immediate cessation with PCR testing entirely, as it is a completely unreliable method of detection for Sars CoV2.

All Covid-19 testing methods are severely flawed and being employed in a manner that is generating highly corrupted data unsuitable for individual diagnosis of Covid-19 infections.

Testing is generating false positive results by the design of test and the recommended protocols for implementation.


There is extensive documentation that indicates policy makers are fully aware that this testing will produce faulty data, and they have not acted in any matter to seriously correct for SEVERE cycle setting flaw or address the other issues documented in Section 1.


SECTION 3:

Serious Contamination Issues with Early Covid-19 Testing Kits

Mass Contamination & Recall of Millions Early PCR Tests & Other Covid-19 Test Kits Resulted in Mass Faulty Data & Public Health Safety Concerns:

Contamination and recall of early Covid-19 PCR tests was extensively documented in the Spring of 2020. This includes:

100,00 Recalled Tests in Washington State Due to Bacterial Contamination

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/uw-medicine-halts-use-of-coronavirus-testing-kits-airlifted-from-china-after-some-had-contamination/


CDC PCR TESTS FAILED DUE TO CONTAMINATED COMPONENT:

"The initial COVID-19 test kits created by the CDC failed because of a contaminated component, according to a review by the Department of Health and Human Services.


A reagent in the first batch of test kits was likely contaminated, according to the report obtained by Sinclair Broadcasting Group. The kits were meant to be used by public health laboratories until commercial labs could develop and mass produce coronavirus tests"https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200623/early-cdc-covid-19-test-kits-likely-contaminated


CDC knew first coronavirus test was flawed but released it anyway: report | The Hill

https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/medical-advances/524784-cdc-knew-first-coronavirus-test-was-flawed-but


FDA has issued the following list of CoVid Testing

Kits that have been removed from market, the United States has spent billions of dollars on faulty test


Advanced Biological Laboratories (ABL) S.A.

UltraGene Combo2Screen SARS-CoV-2 Assay

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed *

CardiAI Inc.

CoviLampTM Fluorometric Test Kit

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed*

Caspr Biotech Corporation

Direct Caspr Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed*

Ender Diagnostics AG

Ender MASS COVID-19 isothermal PCR detection kit

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

Healgen

Aegle Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

Healgen

Biosynex Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

Healgen

CLINITEST Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

Healgen

Healgen Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

Healgen

Verasure Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

Melbourne Biotech

MB QRT-PCR TEST SARS-COV2(COVID-19)

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

Meridian Bioscience Inc.

Revogene® SARS-CoV-2 assay

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed*

Nanjing Norman Biological Technology Co., Ltd

Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Antigen Testing Kit (Colloidal Gold)

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

QIAGEN QIAreach™

SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed*

Sanwa BioTech Limited

ALiA SARS-CoV-2 Antigen FIA Test

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed*

Spring Healthcare Services

AG SARS COV-2 Antigen Rapid Test Kit

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

SUREDX

V-CHEK Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Antigen Detection Kit

Removed - Should Not Be Distributed

Further, one of the largest PCR test manufacturers, Thermo-Fisher was flagged for false positive errors effecting millions of PCR tests

"Potential accuracy issues with a widely used coronavirus test could lead to false results for patients, U.S. health officials warned".


Dr. Albert Ko of Yale’s School of Public Health said the potential accuracy problems have:


“pretty serious implications” given that Thermo Fisher’s test is used widely both in the U.S. and around the world to screen for coronavirus.

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/letters-health-care-providers/risk-inaccurate-results-thermo-fisher-scientific-taqpath-covid-19-combo-kit-letter-clinical


FDA OFFICIAL THERMOFISHER NOTICEFALSE POSITIVE TEST:

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/removal-lists-tests-should-no-longer-be-used-andor-distributed-covid-19-faqs-testing-sars-cov-2Thermo-Fisher Contracted to Produce 5 Million Tests on 3/14/2020:


https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/14/thermo-fisher-to-produce-millions-of-coronavirus-diagnostic-tests/


Global Covid 19 Test Contamination Issue:

In the UK, 750,000 RANDOX Covid-19 PCR Tests Recalled Due to Safety Issues, Examined for Contaminated Swabs:


The Independent, 8/8/2020

"Hundreds of thousands of unused coronavirus testing kits are being recalled by the government due to safety concerns".

The packs have been sent out by healthcare giant Randox to care homes and individuals throughout the pandemic. But on Saturday morning the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency asked the company to recall up to 750,000 of the kits after safety issues emerged.

Exactly what those issues are has not been revealed but it is understood the Department for Health and Social Care has asked for the sterility of some swabs to be independently verified . Randox was not removed as a testing vendor after this severe issue with test kit contamination came to public


Randox past involvement in scandals with manipulating diagnostic tests to obtain false convictions of drug driving cases made assignment as a Covid-19 test vendor highly controversial in UK:


More than 40 drug driving convictions overturned in probe over 'data manipulation' at, Randox, forensics lab

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/drug-driving-convictions-overturned-randox-testing-laboratory-manchester-data-manipulation-police-a8671286.html


Thousands of Contaminated Tests Recalled in Canada:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/test-kits-contaminated-new-brunswick-1.5534125


1.2 Million Contaminated Tests in Europe Obtained from China

"Kits bought by countries across the continent prove unreliable":

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-01/faulty-virus-tests-cloud-china-s-european-outreach-over-covid-19


Independent review should occur to ascertain true cause of all deaths attributed to Sars CoV 2, Covid-19 infections where possible due to reliance on diagnostic testing unsuitable to diagnosis virus attributed to Covid 19. 96% of Covid-19 attributed deaths have 3.8 other co-morbidities (see vaccine safety, Covid-19 prevalence section below).


Section 1-3 Conclusion:

All mass testing for Sars CoV2(Covid-19) infections needs to immediately cease due to severe testing flaws. Testing is creating false cases and manufacturing an illusion of pandemic threat.


Government officials need to immediately answer for why they are employing testing they have publicly admitted is creating false data by design and continue to advocate for expansion of this testing, and wasting billions of dollars of tax payer dollars.


Additionally , the evidence of majority false positives resulting from high cycle PCR testing rates proves there is zero need for public mass vaccination Covid program.

Public health officials, government agencies, state health departments, and media organizations must immediately CEASE & DESIST in reporting Covid test results as evidence of a case of Covid-19 infection. It is unequivocally inaccurate, as these tests are not reliable indicators for infection with Sars CoV2

SECTION 4

Liability Concerns for Health Professionals:

Mass Public Evidence of Severe Issues with Covid-19 Health Directives Used in Litigation, Imperils Health Care Professionals Ordered to Implement Unsound Health Protocols:


Multiple legal cases have been submitted (or pending submission) in the United States, and internationally due to the very serious flaws and methods with use of Covid-19 testing that is not suitable for the diagnosis of the virus it is designed to detect. In Portugal, the country's high courts ruled that PCR could not be used as evidence to quarantine travelers due to its unreliability for detecting the Sars CoV2:

Covid PCR test reliability doubtful – Portugal judges - The Portugal News

https://www.theportugalnews.com/news/2020-11-27/covid-pcr-test-reliability-doubtful-portugal-judges/56962


Top International Attorney Reiner Fuellmich is currently in the process of filing lawsuits in Germany against Covid-19 policy fraud centered around the PCR testing, coordinating his efforts with lawyers all over the world who will be filing the same injunctions.


Atty Fuellmich is noted for his accomplishments in the Deutsche bank and Volkswagon lawsuits. Fuellmich has stated his filings will be made available free of charge for use in legal filings, so it is not unlikely that health official leadership charged with instituting these directives could get caught up in the fray, as lawsuits progress around the world:


Fuellmich asserts that after coordination with renowned experts, the Covid-19 protocols were not driven by top leadership as a health protocol but rather as a power mechanism:


'economists and lawyers of international renown, among others, conducted by the Berlin Commission of Inquiry:


“The hearings of hundreds of scientists, doctors, uiry into the Covid-19 affair since October 7, 2020, have now shown with a probability approaching 100% certainty that the Covid -19 scandal was never a health issue. ”


Rather, it was a matter of strengthening power"


Current lawsuit efforts to expose criminal corruption to could lead to what many are referring to as the Second Nuremberg trials.

https://evolvetoecology.org/2021/02/27/dr-reiner-fuellmich-begins-legal-litigation-on-the-covid-19-fraud-the-greatest-crime-against-humanity/


Additionally, many smaller lawsuits are being filed individual states with the inclusion of this scientific evidence. Lawsuits are in planning stages or already filed in every state in the country. Vermont case against vaccine mandates filed at federal level utilizing petition sources last week,


Robert F Kennedy Jr is coordinating with lawsuit efforts as well, and recently submitted in a filing in NYC seeking a cessation of public school Covid-19 testing. In a stunning admission, the NYC courts admitted that the PCR test was not able to detect Sars Cov2, but stated it was their best tool:

Indeed, while the judge and NYC authorities acknowledge that PCR testing does not detect COVID infection, they nonetheless assert that it is the best tool they have.

These cases are becoming highly publicized, and leadership is imperiling health care professionals with directives that could result in liability against licensed care providers and severely undermine the credibility of the Health Science professions:

This information is already widely known by large percentage of the citizenry, and the rest of the public will soon become informed once these lawsuits advance to high profile public cases, and leadership is only a delaying an inevitable accounting by refusing to acknowledge what much of the public now understands.

Leadership must immediately address the content of the evidence of litigation and act to ensure health providers are not mandated to implement Covid-19 health directives that imperil health professionals legal, ethical, and licensing standards of practice.


SECTION 5:

Censorship & Political, Professional, Media Misinformation & Attack

Advancing Individual & Public Health Harms, Denigrating Health Professionals and Citizens


The failure of our public health & political leadership to independently review and inform the public of the extensive objective evidence documenting severe flaws and safety issues with emergency approved testing, vaccines, and isolation protocols is nothing short of egregious.


This is amplified by the behavior of health care professional leadership who lockstep capitulate and cede to unscientific government policy with a clear expectation for compliance, and little to no room for honest expression of concerns by 'underlings'.


There has been a very active effort by the media and public health officials to publicly label anyone who opposes Covid-19 vaccinations, testing, and other mandated protocols on evidence based merit with smear labels of 'conspiracy theory' & 'antivaxer' and to politicize what should be a scientific discussion by framing opposition to Covid policies in partisan and unscientific terms. Unfortunately, many in health care leadership, trained in educational programs that emphasize objective and independent review to ensure safe practice, parrot these narratives without any effort to investigate the actual concerns brought to their attention by subordinates.


Some health care professionals have left the profession rather than employ protocols they believe go against their ethics and professional standards and endanger individual and public health. Many health care professionals are demoralized by the coercion to comply with directives or else be professionally ostracized.

Politicians, public health officials and media have deliberately impeded an open and honest public health dialogue around the necessity and safety of a mass testing a vaccination program with emergency use mRNA vaccines through the use of censorship and intimidation tactics.


This has seriously impeded the public's understanding of Covid-19, as health professionals may be reluctant to speak about credible concerns with Covid-19 policies out of fear of ridicule or professional consequence.


The rhetoric now being used against those who advocate for science based public health policy is becoming incendiary with MSNBC Nicole Wallace Anchor woman stating in a interview on January 22, 2021 that those who have a belief that Covid restrictions are unnecessary have a ideology of domestic extremism and equated this evidence based perspective as to being a domestic terrorism threat. This type of dangerous rhetoric crosses the line and must immediately cease.


"There is until the end of April a persistent threat of domestic threat of domestic extremism....of domestic terrorism...carried out in the ideology that and around this belief that the election was fraudulent, that the Covid restrictions are unnecessary'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU5hw9H7htc

Additionally, the Washington Post featured a debunked Op-Ed from California State Senator, Richard Pan, reciting debunked content of the in LA Times to equate vaccine protest with extremism:


Opinion: Anti-vaccine extremism is akin to domestic terrorism

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/anti-vaccine-extremism-is-akin-to-domestic-terrorism/2021/02/26/736aee22-787e-11eb-8115-9ad5e9c02117_story.html

Story was debunked HERE. However, the core point is that equating American protest to a terrorist act is the type of rhetoric one expects to hear in a history review of 30s Germany, not featured content on the Washington Post.

The public must reject such dangerous and inflammatory rhetoric and refuse to allow any individual or media company to divide the American public through hyperbolic speech.


All citizens have deeply harmed by these policies, we resoundingly reject all effort to split our unity in healing through this crisis

Political and health officials who praise health care workers and minority population to push Covid -19 protocols and mass vaccination campaigns are proven insincere when they censor, attack, dismiss, or insult members from these same groups who oppose Covid 19 policy on the evidence.

We will not abide co-opting any group by political and health leaders for the purpose of generating support for legislative policies which harm the very groups politicians and political parties claim to support the most.


The politicians and media have refused to have a discussion on the merits, and when individuals will not cede to inaccurate narratives, public education programs are created to recite the same talking points broadcast 24/ for near a year without any acknowledgement of true and evidence based concerns. This belittles citizens.

Millions Spent on 'Vaccine Education"


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/02/15/covid-19-vaccine-education-campaigns-coronavirus/4371762001/


Freedom to challenge inaccurate government data and policy is necessary to protect the health and well being of every American citizen (and all citizens around the globe).


Free speech is a public health issue


It is time for a immediate and full public accounting of facts. Leadership must addres valid concerns on current Covid-19 health protocols expressed by health care professionals and citizens alike without the ugly tactics of smear & deliberate misrepresentation of the message. Discredit the messenger campaigns and personal attack are not acceptable and it is alienating the majority of public who increasingly understand the severe issues with the current Covid-19 health protocol directives.


SECTION 6:

Sars CoV2 Covid-19 Emergency Approved Vaccines

Unnecessary & Unsafe: Post-Vaccine Injury and Deaths Go Uninvestigated and Unreported

The central point is mass vaccination for Sars CoV2 Covid 19 infection is entirely unnecessary.


A review of the severe errors and testing recommendation flaws documented above show the vast majority of Covid-19 cases were not actual infections, but rather, false positive tests results reported erroneously as Covid-19 infections due to incorrect CT setting rate and other testing errors.


Studies that adjusted for the Cycle Threshold error alone found 85 - 90% effective false positive test results. On this one error alone, the pandemic is shown to have been based on faulty test and reporting methods.

Antigen testing has been employed in low incident settings which will create majority false positive through improper application of the testing in these population groups.

Antibody tests are a general test, and equally unsuitable for Sars CoV2 diagnosis.


1. Pandemic does NOT Constitute Significant Public Health Emergency to warrant Emergency Appoval


The government has spent billions of dollars in contracts for mass vaccination programs with emergency approved vaccines utilizing experimental mRNA technology (Moderna & Pfizer) and adenovirus technology (Pfizer) This has been justified on a severe and unprecedented health threat.


However, the government's own PCR test data mirrors fatality rate as that of other seasonal viral infections (even before adjustment for majority false positive rates due do to test errors).


CDC Sars CoV2 Fatality Ratio Chart:

Infection Fatality Ratio: Survival rate

0-19 years: 0.00003 99.97

20-49 years: 0.0002 99.98

50-69 years: 0.005 99.5

70+ years: 0.054 94.5


The government's own CDC figures indicate that Sars CoV2 does not constitute a public health emergency that would warrant bypassing necessary safety protocols and emergency vaccine approval


Additionally, the CDC notes 3.8 other causes in deaths attributed to Sars CoV2:

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm


"For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 3.8 additional conditions or causes per death". Misattribution of true cause of morbidity in Covid deaths has been an ongoing concern as states have adopted death attribution methods that rely on flawed testing or equate dying with a positive Covid-19 test to dying of Covid 19. Given the majority rate of false positives with use of PCR, this data is completely corrupted


Further, some states such as New York are attributing Covid 19 as cause of death without the pretense of lab confirmation at all, a unsuitable standard given that Covid 19 symptoms present the same as many other respiratory illnesses and diseases.


It is near certain that the above fatality rate would drop significantly if testing flaws and misattribution of morbidity to Covid 19 from other underlying causes was corrected. This should immediately be implemented by appropriate agencies.

Symptomatic presentation with a positive Covid-19 PCR test also is incredibly low with up to 86% of individuals tested not presenting symptomatically with a positive PCR test.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/08/more-than-80percent-of-people-with-coronavirus-had-no-symptoms-uk-study.html


"University College London researchers studied data collected by U.K. statistics body, the Office for National Statistics, which has been regularly collecting coronavirus testing data from thousands of British households during the pandemic as part of its “infection survey.” The survey tests households whether they have symptoms or not.

The study, which was peer reviewed, looked at 36,061 individuals who took a coronavirus test as part of the infection survey between 26 April and 27 June 2020. It found that 86.1% of those who tested positive for the virus did not report “core” symptoms associated with the virus (a cough, fever or a loss of taste and/or smell) on the day they took a test. Out of the 115 people that received a positive coronavirus result, only 16 reported the main symptoms that we associate with the virus"

This study utilized data result collected with PCR tests to determine infection rates, and reported the same approximate rates of 'asymptomatic infection' as false positive rates from researchers correcting for Cycle Threshold error (85 to 90%). This shows that the asymptomatic rate is matching the false positive PCR testing rate, and demonstrates that testing error is the reason for asymptomatic presentation with a positive PCR test.


Vaccination will NOT correct for non-existent cases created through testing design flaws & recommendations.


Vaccination is not the appropriate solution with majority 'pandemic' cases based on false positive results from a testing recommendation Cycle Threshold rate error.


The logical and necessary solution is to stop employment of Covid19 mass testing programs that creates majority false positive result and to discontinue all use of tests that create compromised and non credible data sets:


Emergency approval needs to be immediately rescinded for all Covid-19 infections as their is not a significant public health threat to justify bypassing vital and necessary safety protocols, especially for henceforth never approved mRNA technology and Adrenovirus vaccines only approved prior for military use


Review of Vaccine Safety Issue & Public Misinformation Campaign by Pharmaceutical Companies:

The American public has been subject to an incessant campaign by the American media companies, government officials, and pharmaceutical companies to present the need for mass Covid-19 vaccination as a public health solution to Covid-19 infections This campaign has pushed erroneous and incorrect information, taken out of the context of true public health threat, without adequate or transparent disclosure to what these vaccinations actually offer in terms of Sars CoV2 protection.

2. Vaccine Trials Based on Flawed Testing & Trial Design

Trials utilized PCR testing that is not suitable for diagnosis of Sars CoV2, per Cormen Drostan Review Report (cited in section 1), thus utilizing a testing method unreliable and inaccurate for measurement of end point outcomes and diagnosis of virus vaccines are designed to treat.


Use of flawed testing invalidates the core credibility of trial research and all research trials and studies utilizing this testing have corrupted their end results due to severe flaws of the testing methods employed to measure for Sars CoV2 infection.


Emergency Stay was filed on November 25 by Dr. Sing Hang Lee due to this issue: https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2020/11/Stay-Pfizer-vaccine-phase-3-trial.pdf

"Before an EUA or unrestricted license is issued the Pfizer vaccine, or for other vaccines for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection, all “endpoints” or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by Sanger sequencing, given the high cycle thresholds used in some trials. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives.

2. All RT-qPCR-positive test results used to categorize patient as “COVID-19 cases” and used to qualify the trial’s endpoints should be verified by Sanger sequencing to confirm that the tested samples in fact contain a unique SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA. Congruent with FDA requirements for a confirmed diagnosis of human papillomavirus (HPV) using PCR, the sequencing electropherogram must show a minimum of 100 contiguous bases matching the reference sequence with an Expected Value (E Value)"


Dr Lee now asserts that Pfizer has misled public on vaccine after FDA refused to account for documented PCR testing errors:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-misled-public-pfizer-vaccine-efficacy/

“The FDA has misled the public. The key misleading statements are analyzed below point-by-point according to the sequence of their presentation in the Letter but under the following four categories for the convenience of the readers:


“A. Cherry-picking to eviscerate the guidance for issuance of an EUA for a COVID-19 vaccine.

B. Knowingly promoting inaccurate PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2.

C. Finding excuses for using PCR tests with high false-positive rates for this vaccine trial.


3. NO IMMUNITY TO SARS COV2 OR Transmission Containment offered through Covid-19 vaccinations:


Covid-19 vaccination public campaign has leveraged vaccines as a ticket to 'return to normal' although none of the Moderna, Pfizer, or Johnson & Johnson trials produced substantive evidence that any of the three would provide any immunity or transmission containment of Sars Cov2 and can not be considered accurate in any case due to use of PCR to measure end point outcomes and diagnosis of Sars CoV2.


Dr Anthony Fauci publicly admitted in an article in BRG, dated that the early vaccines are being implemented for symptom suppression of Covid-19 symptoms:


"Dr. Anthony Fauci explained in an interview that the actual goal of the early COVID-19 vaccines isn’t even to block infections, a detail that people should be aware of even before considering whether to get a vaccine or which vaccine to go for.

Instead, scientists are aiming to prevent severe COVID-19 cases or stop symptoms altogether. The virus would still gain entry into the human body, but vaccines will stop it from replicating and prevent symptoms, including life-threatening complications"


“The primary thing you want to do is that if people get infected, prevent them from getting sick, and if you prevent them from getting sick, you will ultimately prevent them from getting seriously ill,” Fauci said during an interview at Yahoo Finance’s All Markets Summit on Monday.


“What I would settle for, and all of my colleagues would settle for, is the primary endpoint to prevent clinically recognizable disease.”

Blocking infection altogether is the secondary endpoint of these clinical trials".

What Fauci and others want to see is the prevention of symptoms that can lead to death"

https://bgr.com/2020/10/27/coronavirus-vaccine-efficacy-explained-fauci-interview/


Vaccines that do not stop transmission of a virus or produce immunity to disease are useless as a public health intervention as they offer no containment of spread of Sars CoV2.


All actions to require vaccinations as a prerequisite to restoring freedom of movement and access to society must immediately cease as the Covid-19 vaccines do not offer a solution to halting public transmission of a viral spread. The foundational premise of this argument for vaccinations as necessary for 'return to normal is fatally flawed on this one premise alone.


4. Vaccine Trials Did NOT Measure for Serious Outcomes:

Despite the claims of public health officials, politicians, and media sources stating that Covid-19 vaccinations will reduce serious outcomes for infections attributed to Sars CoV2, trials did not measure for these outcomes and assessed majority mild cases. All these claims lack substantiating evidence:


\Will Covid Vaccines Save Lives, Trials Won't Tell US:

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037

BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4037 (Published 21 October 2020)Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4037


Peter Doshi reportsAs phase III trials of covid-19 vaccines reach their target enrolments, officials have been trying to project calm. The US coronavirus czar Anthony Fauci and the Food and Drug Administration leadership have offered public assurances that established procedures will be followed.1234 Only a “safe and effective” vaccine will be approved, they say, and nine vaccine manufacturers issued a rare joint statement pledging not to prematurely seek regulatory review.5


But what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared “effective”?

To the public this seems fairly obvious. “The primary goal of a covid-19 vaccine is to keep people from getting very sick and dying,” a National Public Radio broadcast said bluntly.6

Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said, “Ideally, you want an antiviral vaccine to do two things . . . first, reduce the likelihood you will get severely ill and go to the hospital, and two, prevent infection and therefore interrupt disease transmission.”


Yet the current phase III trials are not actually set up to prove either table 1.

None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus"


5. 95% Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness for Moderna & Pfizer Misrepresented to Public:

The vaccines have been presented to the public on the premise Moderna & Pfizer vaccinations have up to a 95% effectiveness rating This framing may lead the public to erroneously believe they will be immune to Sars CoV2 (Covid 19) upon vaccination rather than at only decreased risk of symptomatic presentation of illness.

It should be noted again, studies show the majority of individual with a positive Sars Cov2 PCR test present with no symptoms of illness (due to incorrect CT setting rate recommendations as documented in section 2. above)


86 to 88% asymptomatic presentation rate is the current reported rate of Sars CoV2 PCR test, only 14% of individuals have symptoms at all. Vaccination that offer a 9% improvement over current symptom manifestation is not a compelling reason for FDA Emergency approval and bypassing necessary safety protocols for new technology.

Additionally, of the small percentage of individuals with a positive Sars CoV2 PCR test, 81% of those cases present as mild according to research studies:


81% of Covid-19 Cases are Mildhttps://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/coronavirus-81-of-cases-are-mild-study-says

According to the above data, Out of a 100 people, it is estimated:

86 will have NO symptoms of Covid-19 attributed infection

12 will have MILD SYMPTOMS of Covid-19 attributed infection

Only TWO out of a hundred are at risk of moderate or severe Covid-19 attributed symptoms.

Risk Benefit Analysis of this data STRONGLY demonstrates that mass vaccination with Covid-19 vaccine do not have a compelling public health benefit to warrant the administration of Covid-19 vaccinations on a mass public scale, nor justification for bypassing FDA standard emergency approval process with potential significant health safety risks through untested mRNA & Adenovirus technology.


Lastly, the 95% effectiven