Part 6 Petition: Sars CoV2 Covid-19 Emergency Approved Vaccines: Unnecessary, Serious Safety Concern
Updated: Mar 13
Sars CoV2 Covid-19 Emergency Approved Vaccines
Unnecessary & Unsafe: Post-Vaccine Injury and Deaths Go Uninvestigated and Unreported
The central point is mass vaccination for Sars CoV2 Covid 19 infection is entirely unnecessary.
A review of the severe errors and testing recommendation flaws documented above show the vast majority of Covid-19 cases were not actual infections, but rather, false positive tests results reported erroneously as Covid-19 infections due to incorrect CT setting rate and other testing errors.
Studies that adjusted for the Cycle Threshold error alone found 85 - 90% effective false positive test results. On this one error alone, the pandemic is shown to have been based on faulty test and reporting methods.
Antigen testing has been employed in low incident settings which will create majority false positive through improper application of the testing in these population groups.
Antibody tests are a general test, and equally unsuitable for Sars CoV2 diagnosis.
1. Pandemic does NOT Constitute Significant Public Health Emergency to warrant Emergency Appoval
The government has spent billions of dollars in contracts for mass vaccination programs with emergency approved vaccines utilizing experimental mRNA technology (Moderna & Pfizer) and adenovirus technology (Pfizer) This has been justified on a severe and unprecedented health threat.
However, the government's own PCR test data mirrors fatality rate as that of other seasonal viral infections (even before adjustment for majority false positive rates due do to test errors).
CDC Sars CoV2 Fatality Ratio Chart:
Infection Fatality Ratio: Survival rate
0-19 years: 0.00003 99.97
20-49 years: 0.0002 99.98
50-69 years: 0.005 99.5
70+ years: 0.054 94.5
The government's own CDC figures indicate that Sars CoV2 does not constitute a public health emergency that would warrant bypassing necessary safety protocols and emergency vaccine approval
Additionally, the CDC notes 3.8 other causes in deaths attributed to Sars CoV2:
"For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 3.8 additional conditions or causes per death". Misattribution of true cause of morbidity in Covid deaths has been an ongoing concern as states have adopted death attribution methods that rely on flawed testing or equate dying with a positive Covid-19 test to dying of Covid 19. Given the majority rate of false positives with use of PCR, this data is completely corrupted
Further, some states such as New York are attributing Covid 19 as cause of death without the pretense of lab confirmation at all, a unsuitable standard given that Covid 19 symptoms present the same as many other respiratory illnesses and diseases.
It is near certain that the above fatality rate would drop significantly if testing flaws and misattribution of morbidity to Covid 19 from other underlying causes was corrected. This should immediately be implemented by appropriate agencies.
Symptomatic presentation with a positive Covid-19 PCR test also is incredibly low with up to 86% of individuals tested not presenting symptomatically with a positive PCR test.
"University College London researchers studied data collected by U.K. statistics body, the Office for National Statistics, which has been regularly collecting coronavirus testing data from thousands of British households during the pandemic as part of its “infection survey.” The survey tests households whether they have symptoms or not.
The study, which was peer reviewed, looked at 36,061 individuals who took a coronavirus test as part of the infection survey between 26 April and 27 June 2020. It found that 86.1% of those who tested positive for the virus did not report “core” symptoms associated with the virus (a cough, fever or a loss of taste and/or smell) on the day they took a test. Out of the 115 people that received a positive coronavirus result, only 16 reported the main symptoms that we associate with the virus"
This study utilized data result collected with PCR tests to determine infection rates, and reported the same approximate rates of 'asymptomatic infection' as false positive rates from researchers correcting for Cycle Threshold error (85 to 90%). This proves that the asymptomatic rate is matching the false positive PCR testing rate, and demonstrates that testing error is the reason for asymptomatic presentation with a positive PCR test.
Vaccination will NOT correct for non-existent cases created through testing design flaws & recommendations.
Vaccination is not the appropriate solution with majority 'pandemic' cases based on false positive results from a testing recommendation Cycle Threshold rate error.
The logical and necessary solution is to stop employment of Covid19 mass testing programs that creates majority false positive result and to discontinue all use of tests that create compromised and non credible data sets:
Emergency approval needs to be immediately rescinded for all Covid-19 infections as their is not a significant public health threat to justify bypassing vital and necessary safety protocols, especially for henceforth never approved mRNA technology and Adrenovirus vaccines only approved prior for military use
Review of Vaccine Safety Issue & Public Misinformation Campaign by Pharmaceutical Companies:
The American public has been subject to an incessant campaign by the American media companies, government officials, and pharmaceutical companies to present the need for mass Covid-19 vaccination as a public health solution to Covid-19 infections This campaign has pushed erroneous and incorrect information, taken out of the context of true public health threat, without adequate or transparent disclosure to what these vaccinations actually offer in terms of Sars CoV2 protection.
2. Vaccine Trials Based on Flawed Testing & Trial Design
Trials utilized PCR testing that is not suitable for diagnosis of Sars CoV2, per Cormen Drostan Review Report (cited in section 1), thus utilizing a testing method unreliable and inaccurate for measurement of end point outcomes and diagnosis of virus vaccines are designed to treat.
Use of flawed testing invalidates the core credibility of trial research and all research trials and studies utilizing this testing have corrupted their end results due to severe flaws of the testing methods employed to measure for Sars CoV2 infection.
Emergency Stay was filed on November 25 by Dr. Sing Hang Lee due to this issue:
"Before an EUA or unrestricted license is issued for the Pfizer vaccine, or for other vaccines for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection, all “endpoints” or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by Sanger sequencing, given the high cycle thresholds used in some trials. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives.
2. All RT-qPCR-positive test results used to categorize patient as “COVID-19 cases” and used to qualify the trial’s endpoints should be verified by Sanger sequencing to confirm that the tested samples in fact contain a unique SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA. Congruent with FDA requirements for a confirmed diagnosis of human papillomavirus (HPV) using PCR, the sequencing electropherogram must show a minimum of 100 contiguous bases matching the reference sequence with an Expected Value (E Value)"
Dr Lee now asserts that Pfizer has misled public on vaccine after FDA refused to account for documented PCR testing errors:
“The FDA has misled the public. The key misleading statements are analyzed below point-by-point according to the sequence of their presentation in the Letter but under the following four categories for the convenience of the readers:
“A. Cherry-picking to eviscerate the guidance for issuance of an EUA for a COVID-19 vaccine.
B. Knowingly promoting inaccurate PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2.
C. Finding excuses for using PCR tests with high false-positive rates for this vaccine trial.
3. NO IMMUNITY TO SARS COV2 OR Transmission Containment offered through Covid-19 vaccinations:
Covid-19 vaccination public campaign has leveraged vaccines as a ticket to 'return to normal' although none of the Moderna, Pfizer, or Johnson & Johnson trials produced substantive evidence that any of the three would provide any immunity or transmission containment of Sars Cov2 and can not be considered accurate in any case due to use of PCR to measure end point outcomes and diagnosis of Sars CoV2.
Dr Anthony Fauci publicly admitted in an article in BRG, dated that the early vaccines are being implemented for symptom suppression of Covid-19 symptoms:
"Dr. Anthony Fauci explained in an interview that the actual goal of the early COVID-19 vaccines isn’t even to block infections, a detail that people should be aware of even before considering whether to get a vaccine or which vaccine to go for.
Instead, scientists are aiming to prevent severe COVID-19 cases or stop symptoms altogether. The virus would still gain entry into the human body, but vaccines will stop it from replicating and prevent symptoms, including life-threatening complications"
“The primary thing you want to do is that if people get infected, prevent them from getting sick, and if you prevent them from getting sick, you will ultimately prevent them from getting seriously ill,” Fauci said during an interview at Yahoo Finance’s All Markets Summit on Monday.
“What I would settle for, and all of my colleagues would settle for, is the primary endpoint to prevent clinically recognizable disease.”
Blocking infection altogether is the secondary endpoint of these clinical trials".
What Fauci and others want to see is the prevention of symptoms that can lead to death.
Vaccines that do not stop transmission of a virus or produce immunity to disease are useless a public health intervention as they offer no containment of spread of Sars CoV2.
All actions to require vaccinations as a prerequisite to restoring freedom of movement and access to society must immediately cease as the Covid-19 vaccines do not offer a solution to halting public transmission of a viral spread. The foundational premise of this argument for vaccinations as necessary for 'return to normal is fatally flawed on this one premise alone.
4. Vaccine Trials Did NOT Measure for Serious Outcomes:
Despite the claims of public health officials, politicians, and media sources stating that Covid-19 vaccinations will reduce serious outcomes for infections attributed to Sars CoV2, trials did not measure for these outcomes and assessed majority mild cases. All these claims lack substantiating evidence:
Will Covid Vaccines Save Lives, Trials Won't Tell US:
BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4037 (Published 21 October 2020)Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4037
Peter Doshi reports
As phase III trials of covid-19 vaccines reach their target enrolments, officials have been trying to project calm. The US coronavirus czar Anthony Fauci and the Food and Drug Administration leadership have offered public assurances that established procedures will be followed.1234 Only a “safe and effective” vaccine will be approved, they say, and nine vaccine manufacturers issued a rare joint statement pledging not to prematurely seek regulatory review.5
But what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared “effective”?
To the public this seems fairly obvious. “The primary goal of a covid-19 vaccine is to keep people from getting very sick and dying,” a National Public Radio broadcast said bluntly.6
Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said, “Ideally, you want an antiviral vaccine to do two things . . . first, reduce the likelihood you will get severely ill and go to the hospital, and two, prevent infection and therefore interrupt disease transmission.”
Yet the current phase III trials are not actually set up to prove either table 1. None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus"
5. 95% Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness for Moderna & Pfizer Misrepresented to Public:
The vaccines have been presented to the public on the premise Moderna & Pfizer vaccinations have up to a 95% effectiveness rating
This framing may lead the public to erroneously believe they will be immune to Sars CoV2 (Covid 19) upon vaccination rather than at only decreased risk of symptomatic presentation of illness.
It should be noted again, studies show the majority of individual with a positive Sars Cov2 PCR test present with no symptoms of illness (due to incorrect CT setting rate recommendations as documented in section 2. above)
86 to 88% asymptomatic presentation rate is the current reported rate of Sars CoV2 PCR test, only 14% of individuals have symptoms at all. Vaccination that offer a 9% improvement over current symptom manifestation is not a compelling reason for FDA Emergency approval and bypassing necessary safety protocols for new technology.
Additionally, of the small percentage of individuals with a positive Sars CoV2 PCR test, 81% of those cases present as mild according to research studies:
81% of Covid-19 Cases are Mild
According to the above data, Out of a 100 people, it is estimated:
86 will have NO symptoms of Covid-19 attribued infection
12 will have MILD SYMPTOMS of Covid-19 attributed infection
Only TWO out of a hundred are at risk of moderate or severe Covid-19 attributed symptoms.
Risk Benefit Analysis of this data STRONGLY demonstrates that mass vaccination with Covid-19 vaccine do not have a compelling public health benefit to warrant the administration of Covid-19 vaccinations on a mass public scale, nor justification for bypassing FDA standard emergency approval process with potential significant health safety risks through untested mRNA & Adenovirus technology.
Lastly, the 95% effectiveness rate is based on flawed trial designs, utilized end point PCR testing tools unsuitable for detection for Sars CoV2, and utilized a very small sample group of 200 people:
British Medical Journal: Peter Doshi:
“So, the biggest misgiving in the trial is that the "95% effective" stat is taken from the natural infection rate (0.5 - 1% say) which is only 200 people or so possible in each arm. The vaccine makes you feel like you have flu for a while, maybe worse - so you lay low for a good time and don't do things you'd normally do. So that changes your exposure, and the infection rate is lower. You also take meds (such as fever meds that are also pain-relieving) to get over the symptoms of the vaccine - same as you do for a cold (clinical trial members were even told to take such drugs in the trial leaflet) but medications would ameliorate some Covid-19 symptoms (like fever, chills, fatigue, headache and muscle aching) - thus skewing the results in favor of the vaccine trialists, given the fact that the placebo trialists wouldn’t be taking such medications.” ______
“The author reports an Absolute Risk Reduction for the vaccines (treatment versus placebo) of less than 1%. The Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNV) is, by definition, the inverse of the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR).
“So, the NNV is greater than 100. (The inverse of 1/100 = 100). That is, more than 100 people would have to take the vaccine before one extra person would be benefited from getting the two inoculations
6. Covid 19 Vaccines Documented to Cause the Same Side Effects Vaccines are Purported to Suppress in FAR greater number of people:
Authorities admit the goal of the vaccinations is symptom suppression.
The above data documents very few people with a positive Sars CoV2 PCR test will present with any symptoms of a Covid 19 attributed infection, up to 88%. asymptomatic rate.
Inversely, up to 80% of individuals vaccinated with Moderna vaccinations had side effects severe enough to interfere with daily living:
Systemic Reactions: Moderna Vaccine Trial Recipient:
Systemic reactions were reported by the majority of vaccine recipients and at higher rates than placebo recipients. The frequency of systemic reactions was higher in the younger age group than the older age group (81.9% vs 71.9% after dose 2). Within each age group, the frequency and severity of systemic reactions was higher after dose 2 than dose 1. For both age groups, fatigue, headache and myalgia were the most common. The majority of systemic reactions were mild or moderate in severity, after both doses and in both age groups. Fever was more common after the second dose and in the younger group (17.6%) compared to the older group (10.2%). Among vaccine recipients, the median onset of systemic reactions was 1 to 2 days after either dose, with a median duration of 2 days. Grade 4 fever (>40.0°C) was reported by four vaccine recipients after dose 1 and 11 vaccine recipients after dose 2. There was one report of grade 4 fatigue and one report of grade 4 arthralgia, both in the younger age group after dose 1. In the older age group, there was one report of grade 4 nausea or vomiting after dose 2. No other systemic grade 4 reactions were reported.
Side Effect Levels were similar in Pfizer vaccine trial recipients, with 77% of vaccination recipient group having at least one systemic reaction:
"Among all vaccine recipients asked to complete diaries of their symptoms during the 7 days after vaccination, 77.4% reported at least one systemic reaction (headache, vomiting, severe fatigue, chills, etc) The frequency of systemic adverse events was higher in the younger than the older age group (82.8% vs 70.6%). Within each age group, the frequency and severity of systemic adverse events was higher after dose 2 than dose 1."
Full chart from CDC here:
Johnson & Johnson also had a high rate of side effects:
55% of recipients reported at least one systemic side effect. Vaccine effectiveness is reported at 66% :
Vaccine side effects have been so severe with Covid-19 vaccination programs school districts are closing after administration to allow for staff recovery:
Two School Districts have shut down due to post vaccination side effects:
Second school district:
Additionally, there are warnings from health officials that moderate to severe side effects after second Covid-19 vaccine dose:
Warning: Second Dose Side Effects Can be Severe:
There is zero individual or public health benefit to implementing a mass Covid-19 vaccination program with vaccines that do not provide immunity to disease, stop transmission of a virus, and cause the very type of symptoms vaccines are purported to prevent.
And, it is to the point of asininity to assert that side effects that mirror the same symptoms the vaccines are administered to stop, in a FAR greater number of individuals than a PCR attribued Covid-19 infection, is a sign the vaccines are 'working' as promoted by public health official, politicians, and the medic
7. Emergency Approval Allowed mRNA & Adenovirus Technology to Bypass Safety Trials, Nuremberg Code Violation Concerns:
Moderna & Pfizer Sars CoV2 emergency approved vaccines (the currently approved products for vaccination for symptom reduction of Sars CoV2 in the United States) utilize entirely new, never before approved mRNA technology.
Johnson & Johnson utilize controversial adenovirus technology that has never been approved outside of military application for use in humans
mRNA technology has been mass introduced without either proper safety trials or the necessary, ethical & scientific debate through emergency approval of the Moderna & Pfizer vaccinations.
There is considerable concern around the use of mRNA technology and its possible applications in bio-warfare and implications for future social engineering with genetic technology. Neither, the government nor public health officials nor media have been transparent about long standing concerns around mRNA engineering.
Release of this type of technology should be undergone with the utmost seriousness and transparency, governments have a long and sorrid history with engaging with new technological experiments without fore-thought or careful consideration of the long term consequences to the populace.
Many experts argue mRNA technology is NOT a vaccine, and argue that Emergency Approval was a backdoor method to gain approval that it otherwise would have been denied, if it had to meet the usual FDA safety trials and protocols:
In an open letter to the citizens of Israel, Israel National News Issued this warning around mRNA technology:
This is Not A Vaccine:
"Our citizens must first and foremost define the discussion in order to accurately weigh their choices. What they are being asked to inject is not a vaccine as defined by the CDC as “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”  Rather, it is an experimental and novel technology. By definition of the FDA  as a component used as treatment to affect a body’s function, it is in fact a medical device, a physical device that comes in a molecular sized package. Erroneously referring to this intervention as a vaccine exploits the public's ingrained trust of the vaccination program to solicit knee jerk response and action. It keeps us entrenched in needless debate in place of taking the necessary measures to investigate the impact on our health.
DNA is, in short, the basis for our genetic structure. Inside each cell are codes which transfer its information to make proteins through messenger RNA. Messenger RNA is an intermediary between gene and protein and the protein elicits the immune response, not the RNA. The contents of this shot being given on an experimental basis is a synthetic messenger RNA that is inserted into the human system to activate the cell to manufacture, in this case, a spike protein.  An mRNA vaccine is not a vaccine, because it does not elicit an immune response. What it is, is genetic engineering.
"A description of the way mRNA technology works was provide in the Jerusalem Post:
“It uses a sequence of genetic RNA material produced in a lab that, when injected into your body, must invade your cells and hijack your cells’ protein-making machinery called ribosomes to produce the viral components that subsequently train your immune system to fight the virus.”
BE VERY CLEAR, THIS IS EMERGENCY APPROVAL OF NEW TECHNOLOGY, NOT A Traditional VACCINE
The significant safety concerns of the use of mRNA technology with the Pfizer & Moderna vaccines & severe PCR testing flasws resulted in Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former investigator into the WHO 2009 Swine Flu vaccination scandal (here), & Dr Michael Yeadon, Former Vice President of Pfizer, filing an Emergency Stay Against all pending
vaccinations. Document expresses extreme concern with numerous potential & unstudied for health issues including possible antibody reactions from mRNA vaccinations that would interfere with placenta formation in women:
"Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” -
http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019- against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses. There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included. According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer
Additionally, on March 11, 2021, a group of 12 prominent international scientists and physicians issued a letter demanding documentation accounting for seven severe safety issues with Covid-19 vaccinations be immediately provided or else a vaccination approval retraction must be issued.
"Should all such evidence not be available, we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA".
They further issued a statement that the release of the vaccines constituted a Nuremberg Code violation:
There are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
Johnson & Johnson: Adenovirus Technology, Ethical Concerns:
Johnson & Johnson is being touted as a 'safer, more well known' alternative to mRNA vaccination however, Adenovirus technology has never been approved for human use outside military application and it is currently only approved for a Rabies vaccination for wild animals.
"Adenovirus vaccines have a lengthy history of use in the U.S. military, but the FDA’s emergency green light for J&J’s COVID injection represents the first time the agency has authorized an adenovirus-vectored 30 years of study behind it — has a “checkered past,” including as a “failed gene therapy.”
Additionally, Johnson & Johnson Covid 19 vaccine has generated controversy due to it use of human embryonic tissue to create its cell culture line (from above linked CHD story):
"The cell line in which Janssen grows its adenovirus vector is a human embryonic cell line called PER.C6. The retinal tissue that launched the cell line was obtained following the elective abortion of a healthy, 18-week-old fetus".
.8. FDA Approval of Experimental mRNA & Adenovirus Technology without Appropriate Vaccine Injury Monitoring System:
FDA allowed launch of mass vaccination campaign with emergency approved mRNA vaccines without the appropriate mechanisms in place to monitor for safety of products.
CDC VAERS reporting system is only US screening method currently in place to monitor for vaccine injuries and side effects. Studies indicate that only 1% of vaccine related injuries are ever reported to the system:
Contrary to media reports that attempt to dismiss validity of vaccine injuries that are reported to VAERS data as insignificant due to voluntary and open reporting status, the vast majority of reports are from health care providers:
Per Military Health System:
The majority of VAERS reports are sent in by vaccine recipients, health care providers, and vaccine manufacturers'.
Go to VAERS information on this page:
Over eighty percent of these reports are generated from these sources. The media needs to immediately stop dismissing credible evidence and discrediting individual reports of family and friends who utilize these report for accountability and public awareness.
However, it is clear that the United States VAERS reporting system is failing to capture a large percentage of post vaccine adverse reactions and death:
The UK mandatory Assets Reporting Center has received over 243,600 reports of adverse health events (as of 3/6/21) while VAERS has only captured 25,072 adverse reactions on Moderna & Pfizer vaccines combined as of 3/5/2020 with 1136 deaths. These numbers strongly indicate that events are not being appropriate captured and reported in the United States.
Assets Data is reporting over 2,030 blood disorders, 1032 cardiac events, 16,037 nervous system disorders as of 3/06/2021
Vaers has also been observed to be suppressing data. VAERS adverse reaction numbers & death reports are significantly lower than the CDC (who has also been observed lowering numbers of reported cases after official release of new data reports. VAERS is also denying ability to review non-zero number data reports indicating potential for much higher death and injury numbers being censored by website design:
1066 Covid Vaccine post vaccination deaths reported as 2/7/2020 on Official CDC website, the CDC website has not updated number as of 2/27/20: (update, number went DOWN)
VAERS reported 1,106 deaths as of 2/27/2021with 101.47% of 1090 events. These statistics do not make sense. Web capture and real time report of VAERS data documented by this journalist on 2/26/2021:
Of the 1,106 post vaccination deaths have now been officially reported by the official CDC VAERS website. One third of these deaths occurred within the first 48 hr post vaccination:
Over 172 of these deaths occurred same day, some within minutes.
In 1976, the Swine Flu vaccination program was halted in nine states after three post vaccination death occurred and the entire program ended soon thereafter.
As of this writing 1,100 deaths have been documented post vaccine and no action has been taken to halt vaccination and conduct necessary safety review
Only 1% of events associated deaths are likely to be captured, so death rate of 1,106 is NOT an insignificant statistic.
Public health officials and media organizations have been extremely dismissive of deaths occurring post vaccination and reciting authority statements dismissing post vaccine deaths as unrelated to vaccines despite no proper post-mortem investigation and autopsy:
As in the case of this New York Post article:
California who died in the observation of the vaccine clinic immediately post vaccine, with this headline
"Woman Gets Covid Vaccine then Suddenly Dies of Something Else'
"Officials say there were no signs or symptoms the woman had a severe allergic to the vaccine. Her cause of death is still being determined'
Not all vaccine deaths will be attributed to allergic reaction, many adverse reactions listed in by the FDA could result in a lethal outcome, including heart attack and stroke.
FDA WORKING GROUP SIDE EFFECTS LIST FOR EMERGENCY APPROVED COVID19 Vaccines:
Especially egregious is the public health official response to Drene Keyes, and immediate denial of her post vaccination Pfizer death in which she was documented in VAERS notes to have have what looks to have been a classic anaphylactic reaction almost immediately post vaccine:
A 58 year old African American woman experienced a known anaphylactic symptom of the vaccine and went into rapid pulmonary edema within 1/2 hour of vaccine administration and died same day. ER physician confirmed anaphylactic response. Health officials refused to conduct autopsy orpublicly release cause of death, a deliberate action to avoid recording a death strongly correlating to vaccine reaction as official cause.
This story is evolving and it appears there was an official effort to coordinate the official story around Ms Keyes death with high level officials involved in issuing official news release statements:
Another example of a man who collapsed post vaccination outside of the clinic:
"A man collapsed and later died after leaving the Javits Center vaccination site in New York City, but health officials say it is not believed to be due to an allergic reaction. The New York State Health Commissioner confirmed it happened about 25 minutes after the individual was vaccinated and following the required 15-minute observation period".
Woman dies within one day post vaccination with stroke, a FDA listed potential side effect of the Covid vaccination and the media states the vaccine masked the symptom it may very well have caused:
There are over a twelve hundred of these cases, and most are never reported in the media. All but the most high profile and public post vaccination deaths are simply ignored, even those occurring on the same day as vaccine administration.
9. Mass Reports of Post Vaccination Deaths Occurring in Nursing Homes Around the World, US Fails to Investigate as Other Countries Take Action
Right now, there are reports coming in from countries around the globe of significant death clusters among the elderly occurring in care homes post vaccination.
Public health officials are attributing this sudden spike in deaths to Covid 19 outbreaks based on severely flawed testing methods listed above with no autopsies.
This strategy has allowed governments and pharmaceutical companies to bypass true post mortem analysis required for correlating true cause of death. Media 'fact checkers' then assert lack of evidenceas proof vaccines were not a factor in cause of death. No evidence thus becomes THE evidence vaccines are safe. This is not the 'commitment to vaccine safety' we were promised by governments and health officials.
In countries that are completing the necessary health surveillance of post vaccination deaths and conducting autopsies, the deaths have been directly correlated to the vaccines.
'The Norwegian Medicines Agency announced in a press release that as of Thursday, the Norwegian health registry has received reports of 23 people who died shortly after receiving their first dose of the vaccine.
Autopsies Revealed Vaccines Contributed to Deaths:
Of those deaths, 13 have been autopsied and revealed that the common side effects associated with the vaccine may have contributed to more severe reactions among frail, elderly people'
“But we will maybe not give them to the most vulnerable of the elderly, because that might speed up a process where they were what we would say at the end of life phase anyway,” so, “that probably is not what we will continue to do.”
At the time of these elderly deaths, Pfizer/Biotech vaccine was the sole vaccination available in Norway.
This vaccine is the EXACT vaccination used in the United State.
Elderly Care Homes in United States, Other Nations Following Same Post Vaccination Death Pattern as Seen in Norway, Whistle Blowers Speak Out:
The same pattern of elderly care homes deaths is now being reported all over the world.
Spain: Health officials in Spain reportedly halted administration of second Pfizer vaccine after forty-six nursing home residents
Health officials in Spain reportedly halted administration of second Pfizer vaccine after forty-six nursing home residents who had received their first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech’s fast-tracked vaccination against COVID-19 at the beginning of January had died by the end of the month, Spanish media have reported.
A German Whistle Blower contacted Reiner Fuellmich to expose elder coercion, abuse, and post vaccination deaths in Germany. Attorney Fuellmich is one of the top international lawyers in the world currently collaborating with lawyers in many countries to expose pandemic fraud issues.
..within four weeks after the first vaccination with the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine, eight of 31 seniors, who suffered from dementia but were in good physical condition according to their age before the vaccination, died. The first death occurred after only six days, and five other seniors died approximately 14 days after vaccination.
In the UK, reports elderly care home deaths have increased by 46% since the Covid vaccination administration began. Media attributes these deaths to Covid with no credible substantiating evidence or autopsy.
Meallmore Lodgecare home reports outbreak of 35 residents and staff following Covid-19 vaccination in early January time as the firstvaccine dose was administered to residents and staff
New York State: a care home reports 32 deaths, which started after implementation of Covid vaccine administration at the site.
The above is, by far, a full accounting of the post Covid-19 vaccination death clusters being reported in the United States and other nations being attributed to Covid 19 infections on the basis of testing peer review deemed 'useless' for diagnosis of Covid 19/SarsCoV2.
Proper post mortem review should occur going forward post vaccination deaths
Additionally, despite government and media denials of vaccine correlation to post vaccination deaths, the WHO subcommittee for monitoring vaccine safety was sufficiently concerned to hold an emergency meeting. Though they concluded against the evidence that Covid-19 vaccinations should continue, they stated they will continue to monitor reports of post vaccine injury and use this information to inform their process.
" The GACVS subcommittee will continue to monitor the safety data from these vaccines and update any advice as necessary"
Flawed vaccine trials severely under represented frail elderly in trials and the use of these individuals to ascertain safety of emergency approved vaccinations is not only unethical, it could violate the standards of the Nurember Code as this is monitoring effects of entirely new mRNA technology, not just a vaccines.
Additionally, true voluntary consent can't be given without full and accurate disclosure of information presented in honest and understandable context to individuals receiving these vaccinations:
Mass mobilization of high ranking and prominent health professionals is occurring to address the very serious and publicly documented Covid-19 vaccinations safety concerns, outlined in this section, with legal action pending in the U.S. and globally due to the gravity of the issue.
Vaccinations should be halted and an independent safety review conducted by third party investigators