SECTION 7:
Mass Individual & Public Health Harms:
Mass Individual & Public Health Harms:
Result of Covid-19 Directives, Health Policies Based on Severely Flawed Science and Data
First, as documented in section 2, there is absolutely NO substantive evidence that Sars Cov2 is transmitted through 'asympomatic transmission' and overwhelming evidence demonstrate asymptomatic presentation of individuals with positive PCR tests is due to the testing protocols and methods, itself.
Therefore, all social distancing and masking protocols should immediately cease.
Mass individual and public health harms have been documented to have results from the policies & directives documented above. This section is not an exhaustive resource into this subject, however the following warrants documentation:
A brief review of the history of the lockdown is necessary for it is necessary for the public to have the actual context for how lockdown protocols were justified.
We will not refer this period to 'quarantine' as quarantine protocol is instituted for isolation of the sick to protect healthy population. It is limited in scope, and it has a very set standard of practice and a very short window to be effective as a disease containment strategy to avoid a larger outbreak.
This current lockdown has not been a quarantine but the largest mass order of government restriction of freedom of movement in human history.
Quarantines have long been rejected by civil rights, medical, and humanitarian groups due to severe potential for misuse by authorities and the simple fact, it is not an effective widespread measure, working best in very time limited and specific circumstance with individual or very small population sizes
The CDC changed its quarantine regulations in 2016 against advisement of health and civil rights experts after the panicked and unscientific quarantine exposed how the protocol can be abused:
The Ebola Quarantine:
"When the government imposes movement restrictions in a manner that respects scientific evidence and upholds constitutional rights, these measures can in theory be effective at curbing the spread of disease. Yet when the government institutes these measures without regard for scientific evidence and individual rights, public health suffers. The Ebola quarantines imposed in 2014 demonstrate the risk. Although decades of study revealed that Ebola cannot be transmitted unless an individual is symptomatic, fear and the political pressures of an election season led states to quarantine asymptomatic individuals for weeks without justification.
As detailed in a report co-authored by the ACLU and the Yale Global Health Justice Partnership, these quarantines caused international medical organizations to experience as much as a 25 percent drop in recruitment of American health care workers. Volunteers worried that they would lose their jobs if they had to spend an additional three weeks in quarantine upon their return to the United States, and many were unwilling to be kept away from their children and loved ones for such an extended—and unnecessary—period
In addition to the systemic harms of reactionary public health policies, we have seen firsthand the very personal harms of quarantines driven by public fear rather than scientific evidence. As students at Yale Law School, we provide legal representation to eight individuals who were quarantined in Connecticut in 2014: two public health workers and a family of Liberian immigrants. Though none had been exposed to Ebola or posed any threat to public health, the state confined these individuals to their homes for weeks. The state failed to provide these individuals with food or other basic necessities and failed to inform some that they had the legal right to challenge their quarantine orders in court. To this day, Liberian Americans in Connecticut experience shame and stigma as a result of wrongly being labeled a threat to public health"
Apparently, public health officials and civil liberties groups have forgotten the lessons of the Ebola quarantine from the not too distant past. Indeed, these very organizations now share scientifically unsubstantiated or discredited directives for masking, vaccinations, testing and freedom of movement restrictions on social media sites, actively encouraging public compliance with ineffective and damaging mandates that are harming individual and public health.
Fear has not just been a reaction, but a driving directive.
Public health officials, politicians, and media officials utilized a 24/7 fear narrative to drive compliance with government mandates, and utilized bad modeling from Neil Feurgosen to proclaim 2,000,000 American would die if the country did not submit to immediate lockdown protocol. Feurgosen has a long and highly publicized record of being drastically wrong on past pandemic predictions, including the 2009 Swine Flu virus which resulted in a rushed vaccination program that injured several hundred children before it was withdrawn:
In 2009, a government estimate, based on Ferguson’s advice, said a “reasonable worst-case scenario” was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the U.K.
There was literally no reason to trust models created by Neil Feurgoson, a person with an extensive record of predictions that have been consistently inaccurate and directly contributed to huge public health consequences, and it is inexplicable why he would be retained as an expert to lead modeling predictions for pandemic prediction for Sars CoV2.
Lockdown policy has been based on bad models, bad test results driven by the mass contamination that resulted in inaccurate test results by early CDC tests (see section 30) and the current use of highly inaccurate Covid-19 testing models. Without asymptomatic transmission and no real wide spread Sars Cov2 infections in the populace, lockdowns did nothing to protect public health, and studies show areas that did not lock fared better than those that did. This is potentially explained by the higher rate of testing with unreliable testing methods that artificially elevated death and infection rates in these areas (see section 1,2, 3 above):
Lockdowns Don't Work
Stanford Study, Lockdowns Ineffective:
It is now thoroughly documented that there is no reduction of Sars CoV2, Covid-19 covid positive test results through lockdown, masking, and social distancing protocols. There is NO documented benefit however there is extensive evidence of calamitous health harms to individual and public health.
Great Barrington Declaration:
This is not the only petition that has solicited health care experts to act to immediately cease lockdowns (although this petition calls for much broader and immediate action).
The Great Barrington Declaration has over 41,500 medical practioners and 13,800 health scientist along with over 755,000 concerned citizens demanding an immediate end to 'devastating health harms' as a direct result of lockdown policy.
"Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice".
Lockdown policies in Africa seriously threaten public health & threaten poverty and hunger
10,000 Children Estimated Die Monthly Due to Unnecessary Restrictions Around Covid-19:
All around the world, the coronavirus and its restrictions are pushing already hungry communities over the edge, cutting off meager farms from markets and isolating villages from food and medical aid. Virus-linked hunger is leading to the deaths of 10,000 more children a month over the first year of the pandemic, according to an urgent call to action from the United Nations shared with The Associated Press ahead of its publication in the Lancet medical journal.
Restrictions Create Devastating Toll on Mental Health:
In Japan more people died from suicide in one month than entire number of people who had Covid-19 attributed deaths:
Suicide, domestic abuse, & overdoses increasing at alarming rate in US;
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/predictions-suicides-overdoses-domestic-abuse-covid-coming-true/story?id=73836752
And, the lockdowns have killed millions of people:
https://sebastianrushworth.com/2021/03/01/lockdowns-have-killed-millions/
this is a subject that has been extensively covered in many other publications, and this list by no means is an exhaustive source of the many public and individual economic, psychological, social, and physical harms created by lockdown policy, the list is meant to briefly highlight core concerns
Masks: Scientifically Unsupported Policy with Potential to Cause Health Harm:
A brief word on masks.
Masks use is predicated on asymptomatic transmission, an unsubstantiated theory They are completely unnecessary.
Masking has been justified on highly flawed research studies that use PCR testing to measure for endpoint outcome and diagnosis which render this research non-credible and invalid for informing public health opinion.
In addition, most studies utilized to mandate masks are non-peer reviewed with very low population size and no control groups.
It has been very troubling to watch public health officials repeatedly push research (in all areas of Covid-19 science) that does not meet the minimum standard for informing public health policy over established and credible research that meets the meets or exceeds this standard. In every area, health officials have been able to create a false 'debate' by treating all research as suitable for inclusion of public health policy debate and this needs to immediately end.
No credible study exists to prove any benefit for the prevention of disease transmission in a community setting through the use of masking. The long standing and credible science on this issue that acted to guide early masking policy in the United States did not change last spring.
Former US Surgeon General Jerome Adams was correct when he stated last year:
"What the World Health Organization and the CDC have reaffirmed in the last few days is that they do not recommend the general public wear masks," Adams told Fox News' "Fox and Friends."
"There was a study in 2015 looking at medical students. And medical students wearing surgical masks touch their faces on average 23 times. We know a major way that you can get respiratory diseases like coronavirus is by touching a surface and then touching your face."
There are potential evidence based proven health risks to the use of masks which the public health officials and media refuse to examine or report:
German Neurologist Margareta Griesz Warns of Serious Neurological Health Disorders with mask use
English Translation Video:
Dr Margerata-Griesz website:
There are many more credible peer review studies that provide evidence of potential health harms of masking. We feel that the public has gotten lost in the debate of mask 'effectiveness' and missed the larger point. Masks are NOT needed, PERIOD, and masking is potentially harmful to individual and public health. Masking should immediately end.
Conclusion:
Due to the above evidence, we demand an immediate cessation of all mass testing and vaccination programs related to Covid 19.
Public health officials are jeopardizing every health professional by mandating they institute directives that may cause significant individual and public health harm.
Government agencies have no legal right to order health officials implement policy that goes against ethical and legal standards for safe and evidence based practice.
We further request a full independent review from entities outside the agencies and government organizations who have directed this policy into the issues raised in this petition. Immediate public accountability is necessary to restore trust in public health and government institutions.
Around the globe, 100,00s of thousands of scientists, doctors, researchers, nurses, and medical professionals from every field have publicly spoken out about the mass harms Covid-19 policies are creating only to be ignored, censored or attacked.
This is NOT a fringe issue, it is a MAJORITY issue.
Hundreds of millions of citizens around the globe have raised their voices in increasing alarm only to be dismissed with partisan narratives and censorship instead of honest review of evidence and facts.
We will not tolerate this any longer.
Follow the Science is not a political slogan.
Credible science requires a strict moral as well as scientific ethic to serve truth and the public good. This criteria that has been abandoned by the governments and public health organizations mandating these policies.
All efforts to suppress, censor, and attack medical professionals and citizens who are attempting to provide information on the merits of evidence must immediately cease. Data is archived by many sources. Any attempt to misrepresent any individual signing petition or facts stated in this petition will be noted for legal review:
Respectfully Submitted for Your Review,
The Undersigned: (scroll down for download link)
(Petition Signature Update and Tally Page Posted SOON - MANY are signing on FAST)
COLLECT SIGNATURES BY HAND - Join Our Volunteer Team: