Updated: Sep 8
Unite4Truth summary compilation of documentation and context of implications of this data and evidence. Reference source and compilation to share with those ready for objective review of fact.
Note - important review of Mononclonal Antibody Treatments at end of post.
Covid-19 is a manufactured crisis predicated on medical fraud.
This is the central truth which is getting lost in efforts to push back against harmful and unnecessary mandates are based on FRAUD.
Government public health officials, policy makers, and media have enacted a 24/7 disinformation campaign which has disseminated false information to the public. There can be no choice or informed consent on the premise of a lie.
A simple review of the history of Covid-19 'vaccines' reveals the drugs were developed under military agencies with military funding. The entirety of the program has been coached in military language (operation warp speed), with initial testing enacted by military in nursing homes. The military has been engaged in vaccine distribution and guarding of vaccine facilities. Military propaganda tactics have been deployed to censor and silence legitimate criticism and debate. The goal of vaccination has not been to protect individual or public health. The entire Covid-19 manufactured crisis and vaccine drive is a means to an end.
It is not enough for health care professionals and citizens to treat Covid-19 dictates as simply as a 'difference of opinion' or frame this fight solely around retaining medical autonomy.
The 'My body....my choice'....slogan misses the mark. There is no real choice in this framework, as the public has not been presented with accurate information on ANY aspect of the Covid-19 policies and narrative.
How Information is Controlled:
The Gate Keepers: Controlled Opposition
Noam Chomsky, Academic gatekeeper:
Unvaccinated "dangerous: to community despite 'vaccines' not stopping transmission of disease, and, thus, useless as a public health intervention and containment measure.
'Independent' and MSM alike, Pushing Covid-19 Fallacies Debunked by Government Public Health Organization, Vaccine Trial, and Test Manufacturer Data:
Covid-19 is a disease of attribution to other causes.
Nearly half of all Covid-19 attributed mortalities were nothing more than pneumonia or influenza false attributed to Covid through use of severely flawed testing methods unsuitable for diagnosis of Sars CoV2. The flu did NOT disappear, the flu was hijacked to create false cases of Covid-19 to perpetuate cases for the purpose of enacting government mandates and vaccine directives. 10% were blood infections. Diabetes, Alzheimer's and/or hypertension were factors in another 48%.
CDC chart: Co-Morbidity with Covid-19 Attributed Deaths
"For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death".
The criteria for Covid-19 morbidity attribution is a positive test (unsuitable for detection of the virus, see below and/or symptoms which mirror hundreds of other illnesses). This is an unscientific, fraudulent attribution standard which allows deaths to placed under the label of Covid-19 which are not caused by Sars CoV2 infection, by deliberate design of the attribution standard. . Full documentation of CDC attribution standards for Covid-19 mortality, hospitalization, and inspection, please refer HERE:
The Tests Do Not Work: Documented By Public Health Organization/Test Manufacturer Data:
Documentation for Severe Testing Flaws in Companion Blogs with source links:
The tests are non-specific, created without virus isolate of Sars CoV2 (virus attributed to cause Covid-19 symptoms). The central test for detection for Sars CoV2 has been deemed useless for the detection of the virus, thus rendering all case data, morbidity rates, hospitalizations, and research studies utilizing the test for diagnosis and end point outcomes measurements, null and void.
The tests do NOT work. They are set to levels which produce false positives by default of the test cycle threshold setting. Anything over 24 has been shown to pick up nothing more than dead, non infectious material and this was admitted by Drostan, one of the authors of the science paper on which the testing is based. All current RT PCR tests are set at levels above 24 (28 for vaccinated - up to 40 for unvaccinated - another fraud instituted by the CDC to drive higher false positive rates among the unvaccinated to provide more false evidence for completely unnecessary 'vaccines').
RT PCR tests should never have been used from the start, they are a research and not a diagnostic tool. The inventor of the PCR test warned of this issue.
Many individuals are fully aware the tests are faulty and unsuitable for diagnosis of Sars CoV2.
However, there is a large segment of lead opposition to the current vaccine policies which continues to push completely invalid research and data based on these tests.
NO RESEARCH TRIAL UTILIZING TESTS UNSUITABLE FOR DETECTION OF VIRUS AND SET AT CYCLE THRESHOLD RATES WHICH PRODUCE FALSE POSITIVES BY DEFAULT HAS ANY SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY
Natural immunity to Sars CoV2 can not be determined through testing unsuitable for detection of the virus. This fallacy will be utilized to drive more people to Covid-19 testing which can not determine infection with Sars CoV2, and which may be exploited for collection of genetic material.
Global genomic sequencing campaigns are being conducted through use of Covid-19 testing.
Asymptomatic transmission is the FOUNDATIONAL myth, on which all social distancing, masks, and lockdown measures are predicated. The studies are based on 'viral load' levels which RT PCR tests can't measure as they are NOT specific to the virus and all studies are set above 24 CT which pick up nothing but dead non infectious material. The studies do not measure METHOD of transmission of disease, and all studies admit this in research text body.
Full documentation from government data and research trialing dismantling unsubstantiated 'silent infection' and 'asymptomatic transmission' claims may be viewed here:
Masks: Diversion and divide
THERE IS NO ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION of Sars CoV2
Thus, the argument around the efficacy of masks is moot. The masks are not necessary because THERE IS NO ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION of Sars CoV2. Per the trial data itself.
Masks are unnecessary because the premise for which they rationalized is BOGUS.
Vaccines have NO substantive benefit, vaccine trial data and CDC date itself clearly demonstrates the drugs induce the side effects mirroring the symptoms vaccines are purported to suppress (or worse). The drugs do NOT stop transmission of disease, thus, useless as a public health intervention to prevent spread of disease. The evidence, itself, debunks the public health official and pharmaceutical claims. The vaccines are approved on fraudulent premises unsupported by drug company and public health organization data..
There is a very troubling narrative being pushed by many physicians and scientists who have raised warnings against the vaccines which states the drugs may provide benefit to elderly individuals.
Norway changed its recommendation for administering the vaccinations to the frail elderly due to deaths occurring in care homes last January with autopsy findings. The prime minister stated in interview administering Covid-19 vaccinations could 'speed up' end of life process.
Autopsy study found vaccines INDUCING side effects correlated with DEATHS of elderly in care homes. This is the LAST population whom should be administered these harmful and completely unnecessary drugs. Whistleblowers have come out and stated deaths occurring due to vaccinations are being falsely attributed to Covid-19.
A large spike in 'Covid-19' deaths immediately followed the administration of Covid-19 vaccines in care homes. The deaths were attributed to Covid-19 on completely bogus tests or symptoms. Autopsies were NOT conducted in most places (as they were done in Norway who found a direct correlation between deaths and morbidity in elders).
And, it is disturbing that so many physicians opposing the vaccines in younger populations still push these harmful substances on our elderly. It is unethical and dangerous to administer Covid-19 vaccines in medically frail populations, traditionally the LAST groups which will receive approval for new drugs. This standard medical ethic has been turned on its head for Covid-19 vaccines and treatments.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A BREAKTHROUGH CASE OF SARS COV2
Sars CoV2 testing is useless for detection of the virus. Breakthrough cases of Sars CoV2 are attributed on bogus testing standards unsuitable for detection of the virus. Vaccine hospitalizations and deaths are not attributed per actual reason for hospitalization or actual cause of death but positive result,
CDC and public health officials circumnavigate actual post mortem investigation of vaccine associated hospitalizations and death with false attribution standard and testing for Sars CoV2.
Additionally, the CDC is now attributing deaths occurring in individuals who die within two weeks of Covid-19 vaccination as unvaccinated deaths. Full 61% of VAERS reported vaccine deaths occur within two weeks of vaccine administration. The CDC has effectively disappeared majority of deaths occurring post vaccination, by fraudulently labeling the deaths under 'unvaccinated'.
Many of these deaths will be falsely attributed to Covid-19 with testing designed to create false positives by the default of the setting, or simply by attribution of symptoms to Covid-19.
Vaccine related deaths become Covid-19 deaths as happened in the case of Drene Keyes.
Virus Isolation and the Variants:
The issue of virus isolation has been taboo in most independent media circles despite substantial and valid evidence Sars CoV2 was not scientifically established as a new novel coronavirus:
-Gene Sequencing patents attributed to Sars CoV2 predate 2020 per David Martin
THERE IS NO DELTA VARIANT: Reiner Fullemich & David Martin interview:
-Over 80 Freedom of Information Act requests seeking verification of isolation of Sars CoV2 from a sample taken from infected human subject have all come back 'documentation does not exist'
-Testing was developed without Sars CoV2 virus isolate (page 40 CDC Emergency Use PCR Test Guidelines)
"The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019- nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. (cancer cells, existing gene sequencing, and assays".
THIS is the material the detection of Sars CoV2 is based. Blatant fraud documented by the CDC own data). Full analysis of the specific material may be found in this blog.
Additional summary of isolation may be viewed HERE:
*Early death clusters have multiple contributing factors. Majority of individuals questioning proper validation of Sars CoV2 as a new novel coronavirus do not question deaths occurred. Deaths attribution methods and alternative explanation for early death clusters indicate need for independent investigation into early Covid-19 death clusters. More information on contributing factors to early death clusters may be viewed here:
Alternative Covid-19 treatments : WHAT exactly is being treated?
Many of the same independent media and vaccine opposition leads who have documented severe problems with the Covid-19 testing program tout the need for alternative therapies and the benefits of natural immunity against Sars CoV2.
Per above, Covid-19 has been documented as a disease of attribution to other causes through testing which is unsuitable for detection of the virus and set to level that produce false positives by default
Ivermectin: Alternative Media/MSM Headgames:
Ivermectin is an insecticide with a documented history of causing severe neurotoxic side effects in Africa when the drug was administered for river blindness.
A recent study documented that researchers are utilizing nanoparticle technology designed to cross the blood barrier as a delivery system for Ivermectin to treat 'Covid-19'.
Ivermectin is contraindicated in conditions which impede the blood brain barrier, including meningitis because the neurotoxic properties of the drug may cause severe neurological disorders, if this boundary is breached.
Use of these nanoparticles will deliver the neurotoxic qualities of the drug directly into the brain. The fact that the research to utilize this drug is facilitating its delivery, in a way which will poison the brain is a HUGE red flag. And, there is NO need for prophylactic treatment for a virus never properly verified to exist and diagnosed on testing unsuitable for detection of the virus.
Objective review of fact requires examining all evidence ESPECIALLY evidence which runs counter to one's formed opinion. The second this objective review of fact ceases, individuals are abdicating the formation of opinions to outside 'experts' who may not be acting in good faith or may simply be wrong in their interpretation. Look at all the evidence and retain self determination.
Big Pharm drugs are NOT the answer for healing and bolstering immunity.
Monoclonal Antibody Therapy: Insanity on Its Face
Additionally, there is a push monoclonal antibodies which received Emergency Use Authorization to treat MILD to MODERATE symptoms of Covid-19 attributed infection. Adhering to common sense, why do we need experimental drug infusions to treat Covid-19 attributed mild to moderate cold symptoms.
REGEN-COV is authorized for the treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults and pediatric patients (12 years of age and older weighing at least 40 kg) with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing, and who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death.
"Signs and symptoms of infusion-related reactions may include: fever, difficulty breathing, reduced oxygen saturation, chills, nausea, arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, bradycardia), chest pain or discomfort, weakness, altered mental status, headache, bronchospasm, hypotension, hypertension, angioedema, throat irritation, rash including urticaria, pruritus, myalgia, vasovagal reactions (e.g., pre-syncope, syncope), dizziness, fatigue and diaphoresis. Consider slowing or stopping the infusion and administer appropriate medications and/or supportive care if an infusion-related reaction occurs"
Clinical Worsening After REGEN-COV Administration: Clinical worsening of COVID-19 after administration of REGEN-COV has been reported and may include signs or symptoms of fever, hypoxia or increased respiratory difficulty, arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, bradycardia), fatigue, and altered mental status. Some of these events required hospitalization. It is not known if these events were related to REGEN-COV use or were due to progression of COVID-19
Limitations of Benefit and Potential for Risk in Patients with Severe COVID-19: Monoclonal antibodies, such as REGEN-COV, may be associated with worse clinical outcomes when administered to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 requiring high-flow oxygen or mechanical ventilation. Therefore, REGEN-COV is not authorized for use in patients who are hospitalized due to COVID-19, OR who require oxygen therapy due to COVID-19, OR who require an increase in baseline oxygen flow rate due to COVID-19 in those on chronic oxygen therapy due to underlying non-COVID-19–related comorbidity
In sum, the drug is prescribed to stop mild to moderate cold symptoms, it has SEVERE side effect risks not all which are known as the drug is mostly unstudied, and it is associated with WORSE clinical outcomes for severe Covid-19 attributed infections despite authorities pushing the drug as 'prevention' for severe outcomes. It is authorized for use on the basis of tests severely flawed, non specific tests.
Bill Gates pushed therapy:
"Antibody drugs currently undergoing testing could be a panacea for the COVID-19 pandemic ravaging the world once they get regulatory approval, according to the founder of Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) Bill Gates".
“The reduction in death rate there could be pretty high, and those will be out in volume by the end of the year, at least in the rich countries,” Gates said, as reported by the Journal.
Reduction in deaths? This claim is TOTALLY unsupported by the drug's own package insert which states it not approved for treatment of severe illness, documents potential SEVERE side effects, and states severe attributed cases of Covid-19 may worse with use of the drug.
Studies document SEVERE risk with monoclonal antibodies:
"However, administration of mAbs carries the risk of immune reactions such as acute anaphylaxis, serum sickness and the generation of antibodies. In addition, there are numerous adverse effects of mAbs that are related to their specific targets, including infections and cancer, autoimmune disease, and organ-specific adverse events such as cardiotoxicity. In March 2006, a life-threatening cytokine release syndrome occurred during a first-in-human study with TGN1412 (a CD28-specific superagonist mAb), resulting in a range of recommendations to improve the safety of initial human clinical studies with mAbs.
This product should NEVER have received Emergency Use Authorization. This is another mass medical experiment justified on the basis of relieving minor/moderate cold symptoms.
The safety and side effects of monoclonal antibodies
Acute infusion reactions can be caused by a range of mechanisms including anaphylaxis, anaphylactoid reactions, serum sickness, tumour lysis syndrome and cytokine release syndrome.
mAbs against tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) have been associated with reactivation of latent tuberculosis, as well as with other serious infections and malignancies.
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is a rare but serious complication of natalizumab (Tysabri; Biogen Idec, Elan), rituximab (Rituxan/MabThera; Genentech, Biogen Idec) and efalizumab (Raptiva; Genentech).
Treatment with abciximab (ReoPro; Centocor Ortho Biotech, Eli Lilly), an antiplatelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa chimeric Fab antibody fragment, can cause thrombocytopaenia; although it can also be caused by various other mAbs due to immune thrombocytopaenia.
mAbs directed against TNFα can cause a lupus-like syndrome; alemtuzumab (Campath; Genzyme) can mediate thyroid disease through autoimmunity; and mAbs directed against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) can initiate autoimmune colitis.
mAbs against human epidermal growth factor receptor commonly cause skin rashes, while trastuzumab (Herceptin; Genentech), an ERBB2-specific mAb, can cause cardiotoxicity.
The dramatic cytokine storm seen after infusion of TGN1412 (a CD28 superagonist) has resulted in the recommendation of a range of measures to improve the safety of first-in-human clinical testing with mAbs.
These are the known risks of this treatment. Does it make sense EUA was given to treat cold symptoms and may INDUCE worse outcomes?
The solution to the current Covid-19 crisis is not political. The current power operatives who buy and blackmail America's (and global) political systems are vested in keeping people under organization and compliance to politicians and parties which fall under this corrupt control. It does not matter to the controllers which 'side' individuals adhere as long as opposition remains under the dictates of systems, entities, and individuals under the thumb of controllers.
Global citizens can take it from there.