No Breakthrough Cases & No Asymptomatic Transmission: Bogus Research Used to Push Covid-19 Myth

The public health organization and research data out the truth....read the fine print:


All rationale for Covid-19 government 'health' directives dissolve without the false rationale of asymptomatic transmission. Breakthrough case narrative is serving to allow false correlation of Covid-19 infection as cause of illness and death in vaccinated individuals on severely flawed testing and attribution standards, and allows public health officials to circumnavigate investigation into vaccination correlation to injury and death. It is also serving to perpetuate deeply ugly division between citizens who are now each accusing the other as dangerous spreaders of disease on entirely false premises. This must IMMEDIATELY cease, this is EXACTLY what current power operators need to sow to seed division between citizens. Peaceful unity and truth will guide us through this crisis, not succumbing to media seeded fear narratives.


Irish Doctor Warns of Covid-19 Infection Covering Up Severe and Widespread Harms:




Over the past couple of days, both MSM and independent media pushed a pseudo-scientific research study with headlines such as:


"Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers"

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Among Vaccinated Healthcare Workers, Vietnam


Many opposed to Covid-19 vaccine mandate policies immediately posted these articles all over social media as evidence the Covid-19 vaccinations do not work, and result in worse health outcomes.


The Covid-19 vaccinations do not work. A basic review of vaccine trial and public health organization evidence clearly expose this truth as documented with source links HERE.


However, this study is fabricated to advance scientifically unsubstantiated claims to keep the public believing in a false narrative around virus transmission. It is another in a series of studies that are created to perpetuate this debunked fallacy, a review of similar study promoted by CNN is reviewed and debunked HERE


Let's follow the science......


Point One: Viral load does NOT determine Method of Transmission


Pointe two: Viral Load increase determined by RT PCR testing set at levels which will produce false positives by default of Cycle Threshold testing level. There is NO suitable Covid-19 test specific for detection of Sars CoV2


Point Three: There are NO Breakthrough Cases of Covid-19 as breakthrough cases are determined through testing methods unsuitable to detect Sars COV2, and set at rates which produce false positive results by default of test cycle threshold rate setting. There is NO diagnostic test valid for detection of Sars CoV2 per public health organization own data


In depth review HERE:


POINT ONE:


Viral load does NOT determine method of transmission. The studies do NOT determine METHOD of transmission:


Every single study perpetuating this myth admits somewhere in the research text body that the study was not designed and does not determine method of transmission.


This latest study states the following:


"Data on vaccine breakthrough infections, especially those caused by the Delta variant, are limited


"Likewise, it remains unknown regarding the transmission potential of vaccine breakthrough infection cases, especially those infected with the Delta variant"


Transmission of breakthrough cases is UNKNOWN.


This statement contradicts all the other scientific jargon advanced to create non-existent correlation between viral load and transmission.


The entire premise of this study manipulates AROUND this core point.


The study does not determine transmission method only ASSOCIATION of attributed high viral loads which are determined by methods which over amplify tests sample material and aren't actually representative of presence of Sars CoV2 material (see point 2).


Look carefully at the language:


"Interpretation: Breakthrough Delta variant infections are associated with high viral loads,prolonged PCR positivity, and low levels of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies explaining the transmission between the vaccinated people. Physical distancing measure remain critical to reduce SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant transmission".


This is a FALSE interpretation and pseudo-scientific garbage. Method of transmission is NOT determined by study and this study provides ZERO evidence to determine physical distancing measures stop transmission of Sars CoV2. This claim has no place in a study measuring viral load at all, and it exposes AGENDA of researchers in pushing claim completely unrelated and unsupported by their study.


False equivalency is the tactic:


Viral load = Transmission of Sars CoV2. This is FALSE. (Study admits transmission potential UNKNOWN)


Viral Load = Need for Social Distance. This is FALSE. NOTHING in this study provides ANY documentation for this claim.


High Viral Load = Social Distancing is Effective Tactic to Stop Spread. This is FALSE.


Point TWO:


Viral Load increase determined by RT PCR testing set at levels which will produce false positives by default of Cycle Threshold testing level.


RT PCR testing is unsuitable measure to detect Sars CoV-2 (virus attributed to cause Covid-19 symptoms). The current science paper for which this testing is based is on review for retraction due ten severe errors and deemed 'useless' by 22 panel peer review for detection of virus. Full documentation of severe Covid-19 testing flaws for ALL methods as evidenced through government public health organization data with source links may be reviewed HERE & HERE.


ALL Covid-19 research and vaccine trial data has been fatally corrupted through use of testing unsuitable to determine initial diagnosis or end point out measurements. NONE of this data has ANY clinical validity to advise vaccine approvals or public health policy.


RT PCR testing is non specific to Sars CoV2 and picks up live and dead non-infectious material. Set over a cycle level over 24, it has been documented in studies to pick up NO live infectious material:


This study utilized a median RT PCR setts of 31.4 to determine viral load:


Anything over 24 picks up basically nothing more than dead non infectious material.


From Reiner Fuellmich cease and desist letter to Corman Drosten, author of RT PCR Sasrs CoV2 science paper which peer review panel deemed 'useless' for detection of Sars CoV2


"If the test system only begins detection after a large number of replication cycles, the viral load is so low that active infection is ruled out. In the NDR podcast of May 7, 2020, you yourself (Drosten) referred to a study according to which a patient is considered "less infectious" above 25 cycles. In fact, the authors of a Canadian study failed to identify any replicablevirus beyond 24 cycles "


Study revealing no live virus detected at levels over 24 CT:


Predicting Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Diagnostic Samples


Fuellmich cease and desist letter to Corman Drosten HERE.


The FDA has set RT PCR testing at levels which both the World Health Organization & Dr Anthony Fauci publicly document and admit produce false positive by default of the settings. The testing is unsuitable for detection of virus employed to study, thus rendering ALL data and research utilizing testing as means of determination of viral presence as invalidated.


The World Health Organization stated in a December 14 2020 press release faulty testing methods were driving false positive test results and instructed SYMPTOM PRESENTATION to be included in diagnosis of Sars CoV2 attributed infections.


"As with any diagnostic procedure, the positive and negative predictive values for the product in a given testing population are important to note. As the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 decreases, the positive predictive value also decreases.


This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as positivity rate decreases, irrespective of the assay specificity.


Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts, etc.


Point Three:


There are NO Documented Breakthrough Cases of Sars CoV2 in Vaccinated Individuals as positive test is not evidence individual is symptomatic or infectious with Sars CoV2:


There is NO Covid-19 testing method suitable for determination for infection with Sars CoV2 as documented above.


Breakthrough cases in vaccinated individuals are determined through fatally flawed & non specific testing which does not equate to infection with Sars CoV2. No positive test result equated to symptom presentation or contagion potential with Sars CoV2, a fact openly admitted on page 38 of the CDC RT PCR test guidelines:

  • Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.

  • The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection.

  • The performance of this test has not been established for screening of blood or blood products for the presence of 2019-nCoV.

  • This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.

Full article on implications of use of flawed testing on Covid-19 research and data may be viewed HERE.


The breakthrough case narrative is dangerous. It allows public health officials to falsely ascribe Sars CoV2 infection for symptom presentation, hospitalization, or death of vaccinated individuals. It provides allow the CDC and public health officials to circumnavigate true post mortem investigation of correlation between vaccination and illness post vaccination illness and death through FALSELY ASCRIBING Covid-19 as cause of injury based on bogus attribution standard.


Full documentation of unscientific and false attribution standards of determination of infection, hospitalization, and death due to Covid-19 may be viewed HERE.


Government Data Destroys Public Official Covid Claims, Covid-19 Deaths, Cases, Hospitalization


This writer is disheartened to see many independent media outlets and journalists continue to promote severely flawed research studies completely invalidated through severe design flaws and use of testing unsuitable to diagnosis Covid-19 and measure end point outcomes.

It does not require a pHD to determine these studies violate numerous basic tenets required for credible research. A college 101 research class teaches basic research trial review methods for ascertain of credibility of trial data.


Covid-19 research trials are so flawed, most would be rejected for inclusion for presentation in Research 101 college classes.


Issues such as no control group, too small sample size, assertion of claims not backed or studied in research trial, too short duration, not enough diversity in studied population, plague all Covid-19 research data.


There is no excuse for scientific and medical experts to fail to review trial data for criteria to determine if studies meet basic criteria for credibility.


Readers should review ALL trial data directly, as MSM and much of independent media sources continue to highlight Covid-19 research which has no scientific credibility to inform Covid-19 public health policy decisions.


Additionally, many social media posters shared this latest study to frame vaccinated individuals as dangerous spreaders of Covid-19 ( a attributed disease with a 14% symptom presentation rate, and 99.95 survival rate), and descending to engage in the same ugly smear tactics used against the unvaccinated based on manipulated and faulty data. This narrative affirms non existent Covid-19 attributed danger.


Please do not engage in validating these fallacies, it SERVES the current power controller agenda of divide and conquer, at a time we need to unite and refuse to allow narratives to instill fear against each other.


Recommended companion blogs:


Reiner Fuellmich/David Martin: Patent Data Destroys Entire Covid-19 Government Narrative: VIDEO




Truth is light:











2,907 views5 comments