Updated: Jul 21
Children of T-4 - Never again?
The UK Join Committee on Vaccination and Immunization has determined Covid-19 vaccination pose too much risk to healthy children, and instead, will inject only the most vulnerable and medically frail children including those with learning disabilities.
With this determination, the UK will move ahead to utilize the country's most vulnerable youth in a investigative, emergency use drug experiment that goes against international law (the Nuremberg Code).
Children with a severe learning disability to be offered Covid-19 vaccine:
From today, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) is advising that children at increased risk of serious Covid-19 disease are offered the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
Under existing advice, young people aged 16 to 17 with underlying health conditions which put them at higher risk of serious Covid-19 should have already been offered vaccination.
The JCVI is not currently advising routine vaccination of children outside of these groups, based on the current evidence. As evidence shows that Covid-19 rarely causes severe disease in children without underlying health conditions, at this time the JCVI’s view is that the minimal health benefits of offering universal Covid-19 vaccination to children do not outweigh the potential risks".
Historically, medically vulnerable individuals and children are the last to be included in investigative drug trials (all Covid-19 vaccinations are emergency, investigative use only approved only, all Covid-19 vaccine FDA approval letters are linked in blog HERE).
The decision to inoculate learning disabled children makes no medical sense even within the JCVI's rationale. A learning disability would not preclude a child to have a worse physical response to a respiratory illness, nor would a diagnosis of Down's syndrome. The inclusion of groups of children not at greater risk of severe physical response to a Covid-19 attributed infection exposes this is not about medical protection of vulnerable kids. This policy exploits the most vulnerable youth, and utilizes them to participate in a medical experiment that JCVI has deemed as too risky for healthy children.
Although, the current directive does not require vaccination of these population groups, many individuals with severe cognitive and physical disabilities are often cared for in group home settings and will be inoculated per policy of the care home setting. Additionally, parents are not being given accurate information to provide true informed consent. All Covid-19 case infection and morbidity numbers, as well as research and vaccine trials, have been fatally corrupted through use of severely flawed testing.
There is no substantiating risk from Covid-19 attributed infection in this population to justify inoculation of ANY child with unnecessary, investigative use drugs documented to induce severe health complications.
Unethical Policy, Bad Science:
The use of children with compromised health may also serve to obscure possible vaccination injury and allow potential side effect from the vaccines to be dismissed as symptoms from existing illness. This is not only unethical (and illegal) policy, it is atrocious science. It sets up a control group with serious health issues as a baseline for end point measurement outcomes.
For example, the intention to inoculate children with severe neurodisabilities with drugs under investigation for inducing neurological complication including Guillian Barre Syndrome is the height of scientific irresponsibility and poor research trial design. This, not only places already vulnerable individuals at increased risk of potential complications and unnecessary harm, it completely clouds the ability of researchers to ascertain underlying cause of any neurological symptoms that may occur.
All Covid-19 vaccine data is being collected to inform final regulatory health organization approvals.
Echos of T-4:
The decision to inject mentally and physically disabled children with Covid-19 inoculations deemed by the JCVI board as too risky for use in healthy populations has chilling echos of Nazi Era medical experimentation and ultimately, killing of disabled populations.
If readers think this comparison is too 'extreme' or not relevant to current Covid-19 vaccination directives, it should be considered that the lead developers of one of the UK's most widely administered Covid-19 vaccination (Astra-Zeneca) have direct ties to founding organizations of the Eugenic Movement:
"For instance, mainstream media has had little, if anything, to say about the role of the vaccine developers’ private company – Vaccitech – in the Oxford-AstraZeneca partnership, a company whose main investors include former top Deutsche Bank executives, Silicon Valley behemoth Google and the UK government. All of them stand to profit from the vaccine alongside the vaccine’s two developers, Adrian Hill and Sarah Gilbert, who retain an estimated 10% stake in the company. Another overlooked point is the plan to dramatically alter the current sales model for the vaccine following the initial wave of its administration, which would see profits soar, especially if the now obvious push to make COVID-19 vaccination an annual affair for the foreseeable future is made reality.
Yet, arguably most troubling of all is the direct link of the vaccine’s lead developers to the Wellcome Trust and, in the case of Adrian Hill, the Galton Institute, two groups with longstanding ties to the UK Eugenics movement. The latter organization, named for the “father of eugenics” Francis Galton, is the re-named UK Eugenics Society, a group notorious for its promotion of racist pseudoscience and efforts to “improve racial stock” by reducing the population of those deemed inferior for over a century.
The ties of Adrian Hill to the Galton Institute should raise obvious concerns given the push to make the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine he developed with Gilbert the vaccine of choice for the developing world, particularly countries in Latin America, South and Southeast Asia and Africa, the very areas where the Galton Institute’s past members have called for reducing population growth".
Important Video: James Corbett/Whitney Webb:
Exploring the Oxford Astrazeneca Eugenics Link:
In T-4, disabled and children viewed as 'mentally deficient' were targeted by the state for extermination (murder):
"The first to be eliminated were too young to speak on their own behalf. In fall 1938, the parents of a severely disabled infant petitioned Hitler for the right to kill their child. He granted the petition and saw in the request an opportunity to encourage what he called “mercy killings” or “euthanasia.” In fact, according to science historian Robert N. Proctor, the goal was not to provide mercy to the victims but to improve the “Aryan” race and make hospital beds and personnel available for the coming war.
Hitler also thought that the war might minimize protests from Germans who learned of the deaths. According to Hitler’s chief medical officer, “The Führer was of the opinion that such a program could be put into effect more smoothly and rapidly in time of war, and that in the general upheaval of war, the open resistance anticipated from the church would not play the part it might in other circumstances.”
The following spring, Hitler set up a committee of physicians to prepare for the murder of mentally and physically disabled children. Known as the Reich Committee for the Scientific Treatment of Severe Hereditary and Congenital Diseases, the group was told to keep its mission secret. In August 1939, just two weeks before the invasion of Poland, committee members asked doctors and midwives to fill out a questionnaire that would identify children born with various deformities or disabilities. Initially, the focus was on children under the age of three. The committee claimed it was using the information “to clarify certain scientific questions.” In fact, it was used to determine which children would be allowed to live".
A Continued Pattern of Abuse:
"People with learning disabilities are still being given do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in England despite widespread condemnation of the practice leading to an investigation by the Care Quality Commission (CQQ).
More on the role of DNR contribution to early Covid-19 attributed deaths may be reviewed here:
Risks Outweigh 'Benefits'
Contrary to public health official claims, evidence clearly indicates risks not do NOT outweigh benefits in any population:
Overview of Current UK Covid-19 Vaccine Injury Data:
The UK has received over a million injury reports for Covid-19 vaccinations since the experiment's inception last December including: (as of July 1, 2021):
Total: 1,007,553 Injuries/Deaths Reported
AstraZeneca: 936 deaths and 762,706 injuries. (Source.)
Pfizer- BioNTech: 439 deaths and 223,404 injuries. (Source.)
Moderna: 5 deaths and 18,548 injuries. (Source.)
Unspecified COVID-19 injections: 23 deaths and 2595 injuries. (Source.)
The population of the UK is 66 million.
Current percentage vaccinated as of 7/17/2021:
Over 1 in 36 have reported an injury post Covid-19 vaccination in the UK. All vaccine injuries are not captured via official government reporting systems.
This is not due to 'silent infections', it is due to severely flawed testing which research studies have found produce false positive results due to cycle recommendation setting errors that over amplify sample material. All Covid-19 testing is non-specific to Sars CoV-2, the virus attributed to cause Covid-19 symptoms.
And, recent case decreases in Covid-19 infection and mortality rates are shown to have resulted from changes in government testing protocol recommendations, not Covid-19 vaccinations. This is extensively documented by the government health organization's own data and evidence (documentation HERE & HERE).
All citizens must FIRMLY denounce continued vaccination efforts in all populations, and not mince words to sugar coat the true intent of government militarized mass inoculations programs showing no substantive benefit and mass harm to individual and public health.
Recommended Companion Article: