top of page
Guest Post Contributers:

Action Alert: NY Legislature Introduces Citizen Detainment Bill, Documentation Letter to Share

Updated: Dec 21, 2021


Update: (Nick Perry is withdrawing the bill. Read the article and then view his Twitter announcement at end)


NEVER AGAIN IS NOW


Please email this information to ALL policy makers, news outlets, health professional organizations, testing program coordinators, school superintendents, this is NOT a civil liberties debate. This is extensively documented MEDICAL FRAUD and we must address Covid-19 policy violations as such. This letter is centered around NY but you can adjust it to your own state (or send as is...noting the documentation applies to other states. We ask also that you follow up your letter with a phone call.


Dear.....(insert recipient)


I am writing today to inform you about the following urgent information around Covid-19 testing, vaccine protocols and policy protocols. (if you are a health professional or academic, insert your credentials here)


The following information is centered around New York state but applies to all states implementing testing & vaccine policy against the WHO/FDA, CDC updates and warning statements & new Pfizer documentation showing the pharmaceutical company fraudulently misrepresented its safety data in order to obtain FDA approval:


Summary:


New York has instituted draconian (and illegal) Covid-19 policy mandates based on faulty test data and misrepresentation of vaccine trial evidence. New York City has banned non vaccinated citizens from entering certain public spaces and mandated distancing and masking policies despite the evidence CLEARLY documenting:


Vaccines do NOT stop transmission of disease, they were approved for suppression of symptoms. This is admitted by Dr Anthony Fauci and CDC Director Walensky, so why do policy makers and the media continue to push the need for vaccination to ‘protect others’ as a drug which doesn’t stop spread of disease is USELESS as.a public health containment measure:

Fauci – inoculations approved for symptom suppression


“The primary thing you want to do is that if people get infected, prevent them from getting sick, and if you prevent them from getting sick, you will ultimately prevent them from getting seriously ill,” Fauci said during an interview at Yahoo Finance’s All Markets Summit on Monday. “What I would settle for, and all of my colleagues would settle for, is the primary endpoint to prevent clinically recognizable disease.”


CDC Director admits the vaccines do not stop transmission of disease


Bill Gates now admitted it (lead promoter and research funder of Covid-19 vaccine program)


Public health officials and policy makers have misrepresented the vaccine trial design and falsely purported 'vaccines save lives' when vaccine trials measured majority mild cases and did NOT study for reduction in severe outcomes or prevention of Sars CoV2 attributed transmission:

Evaluating mild, not severe, disease: (Covid-19 vaccine trials)

"In a September interview Medscape editor in chief Eric Topol pondered what counts as a recorded “event” in the vaccine trials. “We’re not talking about just a PCR [polymerase chain reaction test]-positive mild infection. It has to be moderate to severe illness to qualify as an event, correct?” he asked.8

“That’s right,” concurred his guest, Paul Offit, a vaccinologist who sits on the FDA advisory committee that may ultimately recommend the vaccines for licence or emergency use authorisation.

But that’s not right. In all the ongoing phase III trials for which details have been released, laboratory confirmed infections even with only mild symptoms qualify as meeting the primary endpoint definition.9101112 In Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, for example, people with only a cough and positive laboratory test would bring those trials one event closer to their completion. (If AstraZeneca’s ongoing UK trial is designed similarly to its “paused” US trial for which the company has released details, a cough and fever with positive PCR test would suffice)."

The government is instituting these directives to allegedly 'protect' the public from a Covid-19 attributed infection which presents asymptomatically or with mild symptoms 98% of the time:


86% of Covid-19 attributed case have NO core symptoms –Oxford Study



Individuals testing positive with no symptoms is misrepresented as evidence of widespread Covid-19 ‘asymptomatic infection despite review of test protocol and methods clearly documenting individuals without symptoms are receiving false positive tests. This was highlighted in a NYT story over a year ago when researchers adjusted for high cycle rates with PCR tests:



Unfortunately, the NYT misrepresented over amplified test material as viral load and proposed antigen testing as solution to problem rather than simply lowering cycle rates to correct for the PCR test problem:


Anything over 24 cycles has been found to pick up NO live material (this isn't viral load, it is dead non infectious material and debris:



"There was no growth in samples with a Ct > 24"


This cycle amplification standard has been formerly referenced by authors of the science paper which the PCR testing is based, as documented in this cease and desist letter served to Dr Christian Drosten by Atty. Reiner Fuellmich: (one author of the Corman Drosten report on which the PCR testing methods are derived:


"If the test system only begins detection after a large number of replication cycles, the viral

load is so low that active infection is ruled out. In the NDR podcast of May 7, 2020, you

yourself referred to a study according to which a patient is considered "less infectious"

above 25 cycles. In fact, the authors of a Canadian study failed to identify any replicable

virus beyond 24 cycles (Jared Bullard et al. in Clinical Infectious Diseases,

https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ ciaa638). Nevertheless, when the new case numbers are

added up again, nowhere is it checked at which Ct value the cut-off was set in the

respective positive test case. This makes the result of a PCR test highly susceptible to

manipulation - and thus susceptible to political influence when high case numbers are

"needed" in order to intimidate the population. In any case, the values determined on the

basis of a PCR test are not a sufficient basis for a complete shutdown of public life and

interference with people's liberties on an unprecedented scale".


Review of breakthrough/asymptomatic presentation evidence: - asymptomatic transmission is scientifically unsupported theory driven by falsely attributing viral load to dead non infectious material picked up by over amplified PCR tests - fully documented HERE -


Additionally, NY has implemented the Covid-19 testing program (as have all states) against the warning statements and updates issued by the FDA, CDC, & WHO updates:


WHO issued statement on December 14, 2020 warning of the issues documented in the NYT and Fuellmich cease and desist letter stating care providers should include 'symptom' presentation in assigning a Covid-19 diagnosis:


"As with any diagnostic procedure, the positive and negative predictive values for the product in a given testing population are important to note. As the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 decreases, the positive predictive value also decreases. This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as positivity rate decreases, irrespective of the assay specificity. Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts, etc"


NY has NOT corrected to adjust diagnostic criteria to meet WHO warning standards with individuals presenting with false positive tests due to cycle amplification errors and nine other serious flaws documented by the peer review panel which has resulted in a perpetual cycle of mass testing/false positives/non scientific and harmful policy interventions:


The International Consortium of Science peer review panel of 22 relevant credentialed experts concluded after review of PCR testing science paper:


"In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless".


Covid-19 testing was created without Sars CoV2 virus isolate and the CDC Emergency Use Guidelines for the PCR tests admit a positive test result does NOT mean individual is contagious or symptomatic due to Sars CoV2. Full evidence may be viewed HERE.


New York is also determining Covid-19 outbreak numbers on severely flawed methodology with test manufacture data DOCUMENTING testing as unsuitable for measurement of Sars CoV2 incident rates as documented HERE.


Additionally, the state continues to administer the Rapid Antigen testing program against the FDA warning statement/guidance for use of Antigen tests in low incident populations issued on November 3, 2020, implementing the test in population groups which will result in up to 100% false positives on this one protocol error alone:



Article documenting the formula given by the FDA and the false positive which result when instituting tests in low incidence population groups (the ENTIRE US was a low incident population before these tests were introduced right before the 'second wave':



Policy makers, public health officials, and the media continue to misrepresent the government public health organization, vaccine trial data with overly broad attribution standards and test manufacture own data showing testing is driving cases not infection.

This is occurring in the face of mounting evidence of SEVERE injury and death resulting from the Covid-19 vaccination program with latest data showing 4,000 injuries & 109 hospitalizations occurring in children under 12 (a population not at attributed risk for Covid-19 infection even without correcting for the faulty testing and attribution standards) & court ordered document release from Pfizer documents exposing the company deliberately classified and withheld data indicating SERIOUS safety risk with the pharmaceutical company's Covid-19 vaccination as documented HERE:




ALL COVID-19 DIAGNOSTICS, CASE DATA, RESEARCH STUDY IS CLINICALLY INVALIDATED THROUGH USE OF TESTING UNSUITABLE FOR DETECTION OF Sars CoV2 AND RUN AGAINST WARNING/GUIDELINES UPDATES FROM CDC/FDA/WHO


Now, a New York policy maker (M. of A. PERRY) has introduced legislation granting the Governor unconstitutional powers to detain citizens the states SUSPECTS might pose a public health threat:


Section 1. The public health law is amended by adding a new section 2120-a to read as follows: § 2120-A. REMOVAL AND DETENTION OF CASES, CONTACTS AND CARRIERS WHO ARE OR MAY BE A DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH; OTHER ORDERS. 1. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE UTILIZED IN THE EVENT THAT THE GOVERNOR DECLARES A STATE OF HEALTH EMERGENCY DUE TO AN EPIDEMIC OF ANY COMMUNI- CABLE DISEASE. 2. UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED BY A CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER, OR SUSPECTED CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER OF A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE THAT, IN THE OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER, MAY POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY, THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELE- GEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMMISSIONER OR THE HEADS OF LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS, MAY ORDER THE REMOVAL AND/OR DETENTION OF SUCH A PERSON OR OF A GROUP OF SUCH PERSONS BY ISSUING A SINGLE ORDER, IDEN- TIFYING SUCH PERSONS EITHER BY NAME OR BY A REASONABLY SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE INDIVIDUALS OR GROUP BEING DETAINED. SUCH PERSON OR GROUP OF PERSONS SHALL BE DETAINED IN A MEDICAL FACILITY OR OTHER APPRO- PRIATE FACILITY OR PREMISES DESIGNATED BY THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELEGEE AND COMPLYING WITH SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION. 3. A PERSON OR GROUP REMOVED OR DETAINED BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELEGEE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD05242-01-9 A. 99 2 DETAINED FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IN SUCH MANNER AS THE DEPARTMENT MAY DIRECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION.


This unconstitutional and chilling legislation has been empowered to be introduced due to policy makers/health officials capitulating to enact non evidence based Covid-19 policy/protocol directives without independent, objective review of fact. The public health officials are enacting policy which goes against the science of their OWN evidence (and against the legal/license/ethical standards of practice for licensed health professionals and academic educators).


It is imperative all officials involved with enacting/legislating/implementing Covid-19 protocols against scientific data immediately halt all testing/vaccine protocol policy implementation based on this data.


Any media who continues to report against the extensive documentation of SEVERE problems with Covid-19 testing and vaccine policy as documented by public health documentation and vaccine trial evidence is complicit in aiding the government in committing medical fraud against the US citizens (in the past, media officials have faced trial and penalty for this type of misrepresentation of fact - see Nuremberg trials)


Licensed health professionals and academics may also face future potential licensing and legal repercussions in administering testing against government standards and vaccinations approved on manipulated and fraudulent trial designs (extensive evidence in public domain). A Swedish panel of scientists has now called for an end to the Pfizer vaccination program in Sweden due to fraudulent trial designs as documented HERE.


End of letter:


Citizens should provide this information to all local/state policy makers, health organizations, and school officials.


Thank you everyone


This is a EMERGENCY and we MUST stand with the citizens of New York to ensure this draconian legislation is defeated and those who seek to reenact the events of 30s Germany are removed from office.


Full library of Human Rights Abuses Enacted Under Cover of Covid (click on links)


Human Rights Abuses During Covid-19 and Historical Reference Articles


Australia Indigenous SOS to World, Asks for Help, Military Rounding Up & Forcing VACCINE - SHARE (mainstream news announces indigenous rounded up in quarantine camps/overseen by foreign workers exempt from vaccination, fully documented)






Speak No Evil: How Media, Corporate & Political Abusers Inflict Severe Harm & Feign Benevolence (tactics, propaganda to stop critical thinking, demonize truth tellers)




United States Instituted Thousands Covert Military Biological, Radiation Experiments On Own Citizens (IMPORTANT update/biological attack simulations utilizing toxic gas and chemicals utilized in drug delivery systems- fully sourced)


FL Governor Signs Legislation Allowing Forced Medical Treatment, Coerce Vaccination Compliance (medical freedom act bills =draconian unconstitutional totalitarian emergency powers)



Thierry Baudet Exposes the Rockefeller Foundation in Parliament, Pandemic Report Prediction in 2010 (paper outlining use of pandemic for totalitarian government power grabs issued in 2010)





Update: Nick Perry is removing the bill from the docket - claiming peoples' evidence based and serious concerns over unconstitutional overreach of power is 'conspiracy theory':


Extensive documentation from the government public health organization and vaccine trial data is NOT conspiracy theory but it is ALL they have to counter truth.


Fire of 'lies and mistruth? The assemblyman needs to look in a mirror and stop projecting his sins onto those who point them out.




682 views2 comments

2 Comments


Thank you poster....


I'd like to know why that NY BILL pic, shown above has January 6, 2021,, which was, as you can tell 11.6 MONTHS before today???


Was that bill hidden for the whole time? OR what?

Like
Replying to

I don't think it will go through, it is getting panned even from the usual champions but it is a very good question


One can also ask why New Hampshire and Florida governors signed legislation sold as 'medical freedom acts' which grants the government similar detainment powers as outline in this legislation (links at bottom of above article)


This is a blatant totalitarian power grab enacted on the premise of advancing medical safety.

Like
bottom of page