top of page

Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine Halted in Japan, Contamination, Fire Fighters FIGHT BACK, Headline Update

In this Blog: (videos and source links included)

-Huge PUSHBACK continues as government Covid-19 mandates violate the scientific evidence and Constitution of the United States

-Another halt to Covid-19 vaccine administration attributed to mass contamination, 1.76 million doses suspended in Japan

-Covid-19 'boosters (non approved EUA only - current authorization for Pfizer refers to two dose schedule) will be required, AT LEAST, every six months

-BBC News Radio Presenter Dead due to Covid-19 vaccine, autopsy/coroner finds

-Stories of the injured update

-NYC Mayor Deblasio wants expedited Covid-19 vaccine approval for children despite no substantive risk from Covid-19 infection - RESIGN Mayor Deblasiso

The Stories:

L.A. Fire Fighter standing up against vaccine mandate goes viral as hundreds of fire fighters expected to join lawsuit:

Testimony from Hawaii Fire Fighter Chief (nearly in tears) over mandate (links to video):

All Covid-19 policies and directives (including vaccination) go against the government public health organization data and vaccine trial research. Media has allowed public health officials & medical experts acting in violation of licensing laws to make false claims entirely unsupported by the data without the most basic cursory review of available government & research data. Unions fighting mandates should be aware all health administration mandating policies on fraudulent claims are violating ethical standards and licensing laws. Please view this post for public health documentation data to include in opposition lawsuits, complaints, and press releases. Mandates should be opposed on fraud, as well as civil liberty and constitutional violations. All policies violate informed consent laws:

Full Vaccine Trial Data Evidence, Not Vaccines, No Substantive Benefit, Induce Harm:



"Japan suspended the use of 1.63 million doses of Moderna Inc's (MRNA.O) COVID-19 vaccine on Thursday, more than a week after the domestic distributor received reports of contaminants in some vials.

Both Japan and Moderna said no safety or efficacy issues had been identified and the suspension was just a precaution. But the move prompted several Japanese companies to cancel worker vaccinations planned for Thursday.

"Moderna confirms having been notified of cases of particulate matter being seen in drug product vials of its COVID-19 vaccine," the U.S. vaccine maker said in a statement, adding it put the lot in question and two adjacent lots on hold".


Despite official claims of no 'safety' or 'efficacy' issues with the contamination, the report included NO details or description of the actual contaminant found in the Moderna Covid-19 drug.

Contamination has been a widespread issues with both Covid-19 vaccinations and testing kits.

60 million Johnson & Johnson vaccinations were allegedly thrown out despite distribution of U.S. J&J vaccines to other nations during the same period there was not enough production to meet U.S. orders:

Unite4Truth article with extensive source links and discussion on J&J contamination issues may be viewed HERE

Mass contamination of Covid-19 testing kits has been on-going issue globally since the inception of the testing program.

The first tests in Washington state were found to be contaminated with S Maltiphilia bacteria which subsequently was found in tests around the U.S.

Coincidentally, S Maltiphilia infection has been a major factor in ICU admissions in patients with Covid-19 attributed infections.

All early CDC tests were recalled to contamination issues with officials admitting tests were mass released despite known problems.

The public has been repeatedly told to trust public health institutions that have knowingly acted against the available data.

Over 270 different Covid-19 test kits and devices compromising tens of millions of tests have been recalled by the FDA due to contamination and severe flaws. Despite these tests not producing valid results, not one correction has been initiated to correct for false test results to official totals or issue information letters to citizens receiving invalid test results. No safety investigation has been imitated (or requested) for use of testing devices found to be mass contaminated with mold, bacteria, and other contaminants. Companies producing the tests are immediately reported additional government contracts worth tens to hundreds of millions of dollars to produce additional Covid-19 health related products with Emergency Use Authorization shielding companies from any liability or damages.

Full discussion and source links on Covid-19 testing kit and devices may be found here:

Full Updated FDA recall list of Covid-19 testing kits and devices as of July 30 may be viewed HERE. Please expand the third question box for full list to appear.


Headline, US plan to force Covid-19 inoculations AT LEAST every Six Months

"Federal regulators are likely to approve a Covid-19 booster shot for vaccinated adults starting at least six months after the previous dose rather than the eight-month gap they previously announced, a person familiar with the plans said, as the Biden administration steps up preparations for delivering boosters to the public.

Data from vaccine manufacturers and other countries under review by the Food and Drug Administration is based on boosters being given at six months, the person said. The person said approval for boosters for all three Covid-19 shots being administered in the U.S.—those manufactured by Pfizer Inc. and partner BioNTech SE, Moderna Inc. and Johnson & Johnson —is expected in mid-September".

Booster doses remain under EUA, and public health and vaccine trial data clearly document no substantive benefit to inoculations with public health organization and data actively contradicting public health official claims. Full documentation HERE.


BBC Presenter on Newcastle Radio Station Found to Be Caused by Astrazeneca Vaccination: Media initially reported Shaw's death as vaccine related and stated she died after short illness:

Astrazeneca instances of blood clotting are found to be 1 in 50,000 with 23% mortality in those who experience blood clots. This ratio FAR exceeds risked from Covid-19 attributed infection, however, media and 'experts' continue to make false claims Covid-19 attributed infection present with higher risks. The media presentation of these risks as 'very rare' is disingenuous with no context of existing parameters to pull drugs off market. This level of injury should immediately HALT AstraZeneca administration with the blood clotting issue only ONE of numerous documented health risks with vaccine.

Many additional stories of individual vaccine harms dismissed by the media including:

Kelly Higgins public saga of being convinced to take Covid-19 vaccine by 'experts' (who have failed to undergo the most basic review of data and recite public health official claims contradicted by the actual evidence) only to develop myocarditis and require subsequent hospitalization.

Another professional athlete (volley ball player) injured by Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine:

Tens of thousands of injured have formed their own social media sites after experiencing censorship or attack for attempting to publicly share stories, full blog with MANY more injury stories and recent updates may be viewed HERE:

The mayor who has instituted medical apartheid in New York with recent vaccine mandate policy which violate science and the Constitution now wants expedited Covid-19 vaccine approval in children despite CDC documentation showing statistically ZERO risk from Covid-19 attributed infection. This is a betrayal of scientific ethic and Nuremberg code with demand for mass medical experimentation on a vulnerable population. Deblasio needs to resign as does every medical 'expert' and media personality advocating criminal policy on fraudulent information:

Apparently NEVER AGAIN meant unless citizens were threatened by an attributed cold virus with a 99.95 survival & 14% symptom presentation rate. Then, apparently, we need medical martial law.

The Nuremberg Code Text

Introduction The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide. This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body. This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided. This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients. The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics. The Nuremberg Code (1947) Permissible Medical Experiments The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts: 1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is

a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

  1. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

  2. Theexperimentshouldbesodesignedandbasedontheresultsofanimal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

  3. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

  4. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

  5. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

  6. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.

  7. Theexperimentshouldbeconductedonlybyscientificallyqualifiedpersons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

  8. Duringthecourseoftheexperimentthehumansubjectshouldbeatlibertyto bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10.During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

2,327 views0 comments


bottom of page